CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting held June 20, 2018.
PUBLIC COMMENT: In conformance with the Brown Act, no Planning Commission action can occur on items presented during Public Comment. A total of fifteen (15) minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak during Public Comment, fill out a Request to Speak and submit it to the minutes clerk. You may not give your time to another person.
CDP 2018-0017 (DEV2018-0029) – JONES RESIDENCE – Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit for the addition of 1,766 square feet to an existing single-family residence located at 390 Chinquapin Avenue within the Mello II Segment of the city’s Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project site is within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15301(e)(2), Existing Facilities, of the state CEQA Guidelines.
CT 2017-0007/PUD 2017-0006/CDP 2017-0075 (DEV2017-0100) – TAMARACK BEACH HOMES – Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow the demolition of an existing duplex and the development of a five-unit, residential air-space condominium project on a 0.40-acre site located at 438 Tamarack Avenue, within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project site is not within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 “In-Fill Development Projects” of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment.
V2017-0009/PS2017-0087 (DEV12023) – UPTOWN BRESSI RANCH SIGN PROGRAM – Request for approval of a Variance to allow an increase in sign/letter height for one anchor tenant sign and a Modified Sign Program to allow an additional monument sign and increases in sign/letter height and sign area for tenants within the Uptown Bressi commercial center located at the southwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and El Fuerte Street, north of Gateway Road, and east of Colt Place, within Local Facilities Management Zone 17. The City Planner has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15311, “Accessory Structures, On-premise signs,” of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment.
Planning Commission Member Comments
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: CITY PLANNER COMMENTS: CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT:
Jul 18, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting
CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting held June 20, 2018.
PUBLIC COMMENT: In conformance with the Brown Act, no Planning Commission action can occur on items presented during Public Comment. A total of fifteen (15) minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak during Public Comment, fill out a Request to Speak and submit it to the minutes clerk. You may not give your time to another person.
CDP 2018-0017 (DEV2018-0029) – JONES RESIDENCE – Request for approval of a Coastal Development Permit for the addition of 1,766 square feet to an existing single-family residence located at 390 Chinquapin Avenue within the Mello II Segment of the city’s Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project site is within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15301(e)(2), Existing Facilities, of the state CEQA Guidelines.
CT 2017-0007/PUD 2017-0006/CDP 2017-0075 (DEV2017-0100) – TAMARACK BEACH HOMES – Request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit and Coastal Development Permit to allow the demolition of an existing duplex and the development of a five-unit, residential air-space condominium project on a 0.40-acre site located at 438 Tamarack Avenue, within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project site is not within the appealable area of the California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 “In-Fill Development Projects” of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment.
V2017-0009/PS2017-0087 (DEV12023) – UPTOWN BRESSI RANCH SIGN PROGRAM – Request for approval of a Variance to allow an increase in sign/letter height for one anchor tenant sign and a Modified Sign Program to allow an additional monument sign and increases in sign/letter height and sign area for tenants within the Uptown Bressi commercial center located at the southwest corner of Palomar Airport Road and El Fuerte Street, north of Gateway Road, and east of Colt Place, within Local Facilities Management Zone 17. The City Planner has determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15311, “Accessory Structures, On-premise signs,” of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment.
Planning Commission Member Comments
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS: CITY PLANNER COMMENTS: CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT: