Video index

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

Roll call (9 Present, 0 Absent, 0 Excused) (Recorded at 00:04:28)

APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approved: September 3, 2008 (Whitton abstained) (6-0-1)

Motion to approve Minutes from the September 3, 2008 PC hearing. Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by .

PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING

1. PCD 08-02 - NEWPORT AUDIOLOGY CENTERS - Approval of Newport Audiology Centers as an industrial medical use located at 2385 Camino Vida Roble within Local Facilities Management Zone 5 and in the Planned Industrial (P-M) Zone. Resolution No. 6488

Newport Audiology Centers Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6488, APPROVING a Planning Commission determination that Newport Audiology Centers is an industrial medical use and therefore permitted in the Planned Industrial (P-M) Zone based on the findings contained therein. Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by .

Vote to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6488, APPROVING a Planning Commission determination that Newport Audiology Centers is an industrial medical use and therefore permitted in the Planned Industrial (P-M) Zone based on the findings contained therein. (Approved) (Recorded at 00:10:44)

Senior Planner Scott Donnell gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of Staff. Commissioner Boddy asked if the business license could be revoked if the nature of the business significantly changed to become more retail.

2. GPA 07-01/ZC 07-01/LCPA 07-01/SP 07-01/ PDP 01(I)/SDP 07-01/ CDP 07-03 - CARLSBAD ENCINA AUTO PLAZA - Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Addendum; a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Land Use designation from Planned Industrial/Office to Regional Commercial and Public Utilities, a Zone Change from Planned Industrial/Office to General Commercial and Public Utility, a Local Coastal Program Amendment, a Specific Plan, a Precise Development Plan Amendment, and a Coastal Development Permit and approval of a Site Development Plan to develop a 28.3-acre parcel into four separate parcels for the development of an automotive and other motor vehicles sales facility and a public utility use located on the east side of Avenida Encinas between Palomar Airport Road and Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 22. Resolutions No. 6445, 6444, 6446, 6447, 6448, 6449, 6450, 6451

Carlsbad Encina Auto Plaza Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6445 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Addendum and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6444, 6446, 6447, 6448, 6449, 6450 and 6451 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of General Plan Amendment 07-01, Zone Change 07-01, Local Coastal Program Amendment 07-01, Specific Plan 07-01, Precise Development Plan Amendment 01(I), and Coastal Development Permit 07-03 and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6450 APPROVING Site Development Plan 07-01, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein including the Errata Sheet. Moved by Commissioner Baker, seconded by .

Vote to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6445 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Addendum and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6444, 6446, 6447, 6448, 6449, 6450 and 6451 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of General Plan Amendment 07-01, Zone Change 07-01, Local Coastal Program Amendment 07-01, Specific Plan 07-01, Precise Development Plan Amendment 01(I), and Coastal Development Permit 07-03 and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6450 APPROVING Site Development Plan 07-01, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein including the Errata Sheet. (Approved) (Recorded at 02:33:00)

Senior Planner Van Lynch responded in detailed to all the issues raised at the previous hearing and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions. Commissioner Baker stated several letters requested that an EIR be prepared for the project. Commissioner Baker asked what an EIR does for the project and if it stops the project from moving forward. Jane Mobaldi, Assistant City Attorney, stated it would prolong the project but it would not stop the project from progressing. There are review periods and response periods that take time. She further stated there must be substantial evidence that the project will result in a significant impact in order to proceed with an EIR. Staff prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration and feels those impacts have been mitigated to the point that will not reach a level of significance. The Commission is allowed to consider credibility of the public, however, public opposition in and of itself is not evidence enough. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any further questions. Seeing none, he asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Jack Henthorn, Henthorn and Associates, Balfour Court, responded to all the issues raised at the previous meeting and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Dr. Rick Tavares, Investigative Science and Engineering, 11444 D Street, Ramona...90 dBA is the point at which earplugs need to be worn, at 3 feet, it would be cause permanent hearing damage. Dr. Tavares gave a detailed presentation regarding noise and lighting and stated he would be available to answer questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Chairperson Whitton asked for a description of the light shields. Dr. Tavares explained the shields. Commissioner Montgomery asked about the lighting being mercury vapor lights compared to the low pressure sodium lights. Commissioner Dominguez asked for a comparison between the existing Car Country Carlsbad and this proposed project. Mr. Hofman stated that there is a condition regarding the lighting and that it cannot change unless it is approved by the Commission. Commissioner Dominguez asked about lighting on the ballard lighting. Mr. Hofman stated those are very detailed questions but the Commission can condition those lights to be shielded.

Commissioner Baker commented about the lighting conditions because only a certain amount of light can escape the site. Mr. Neu stated that the condition that was modified should tie back to the lighting study. There will be a post installation study to verify that. Chairperson Whitton asked about the music on site. Mr. Hofman stated there is a condition where the sound emitted from speakers cannot exceed 3 decibels beyond the amibient. Mr. Neu stated that was included in the Errata Sheet. Commissioner Douglas asked if the level of music would be similar to the Forum shops. Commissioner Douglas asked about the hours of operation. Open for business. Sales are open at 8:00. Deliveries? Will be during business hours. Every effort is made to deliver the vehicles to be during business hours. Designated drop off area for the vehicles. Can hold up to 3 car carrier trucks. Commissioner Douglas stated she wants to ensure all possible actions have been taken so that the residential neighborhoods remain safe. Mr. Hofman stated measures have been taken all along during this project. Chairperson Whitton asked about the deliveries will not unload until site opens. Same with used vehicles. Commissioner Montgomery asked Mr. Hofman to respond to the increased traffic generation. Mr. Hofman stated that in the Circulation Study took into account this project as well as the potential future plans for the area. Three mitigation required. The trips were accounted for and mitigation measures were put in place for this project. The peak trips are lower with less impact to roadways.

Commissioner Montgomery... Mr. Hofman stated that with the proposed mitigation the impacts are less. What benefit is the over the existing. Increase in taxes that the City will get. Commissioner Dominguez asked about the improvements to Avenida Encinas. Mr. Lynch stated that it would be built to full width but only striped to one lane until such a time that warrants. Commissioner Boddy...clarification on traffic increase. Mr. Van Peski stated.... Chairperson Whitton asked about traffic signals. Mr. Van Peski stated the project proposes a traffic signal at the main entrance to the coaster station. Chairperson Whitton acknowledged receipt of the letters and the Errata sheet for the project. Commissioner Montgomery asked for clarification on the remainder parcel. Commissioner Montgomery is concerned with the City carrying the burden of the project. Ms. Mobaldi reminded the Commission that the minor subdivision is not part of the approval tonight. Commissioner Montgomery.... Mr. Neu stated the remainder parcel is of a size and shape that it would not create a dividable lot. Through the SP, the road could be improved now and the applicant can be reimbursement at a later date. Commissioner Montgomery asked if it could go away...The commission does not have any authority to make the remainder parcel go away. The

Mr. Neu stated that Errata does include those provisions. Commissioner Cardosa asked if the reports are public and asked if Mr. Vallone has inspected any of the reports. Mr. Lynch stated no. Chairperson Whitton commented on public testimony. Patricia Sanchez, ??? Franciscan Road, stated that a traffic light is not wanted. The light is light pollution. Ms. Sanchez asked if the light could be angled. Mr. Van Peski stated there is a procedure for shields to be placed on the lights. Bill Wisener, 64?? Surfside Lane, commented on the signage. North and south bound only and not illuminated. Eric Hall, 6459 Franciscan Road, asked if the Commission and Staff had considered the cumulative effects of noise on the surrounding neighborhoods. Has the test track been tested for noise. Horns and decibels levels. Did traffic study contemplate employee trips, patrons coming for sales, deliveries, patrons for service, the variety of the trips per day. Project should have a focused EIR. Mr. Van Lynch deferred to the accoustical engineer. Dr. Tavares stated that cumulative effects were examined. Tommy White, 6453 Franciscan Road, stated the ultra modern design of the project does not belong in this area. Craig Sturgis, 6477 Franciscan Road, stated the train is intermittent unlike the noise from the dealership. Mr. Van Peski stated the SANDAG.....

Ken Vallone, 6462 Franciscan Road, stated that the benefit for the City or the citizens has not been addressed. The operational hours for Office Commercial are less. Against the project. Commissioner Montgomery asked for clarification regarding the intermittent noise of the railroad. Dr. Tavares stated there is also the noise from the PCH, the freeway. The sound on site does not get any lower to the mid 50's. Commissioner Baker asked Staff to discuss the comment period for the Negative declaration. Mr. Lynch stated that throughout the project there have been many notices. CEQA for 30 days.

Commissioner Dominguez asked Ms. Mobaldi about fair argument standards. Ms. Mobaldi stated that the Commission needs to look at the project as a whole..... Commissioner Dominguez asked if there is such a thing as a focused EIR. Mr. Neu stated yes and there would only be those issues that were felt to be pertinent to the project. Mr. Neu pointed out to the Initial Study. The technical studies are not available on the website. DISCUSSION Commissioner Cardosa can support the project as presented. Commissioner Boddy does not see a great benefit to the project and feels the site is properly zoned as it is. Commissioner Douglas stated she is concerned with the proximity to the residential. Commissioner Dominguez stated the dynamics with this project as compared to Car Country Carlsbad is completely different. He further stated he agrees with Commissioner Boddy. Commissioner Baker stated this is a good thing for the City and provides increased sales taxes. She stated the project is conditioned with all the lighting and noise studies. Test garden on rectangular property. She is not objected to this project. Commissioner Montgomery stated he agrees with Commissioner Boddy.Would like to pause and consider effects on the area as a whole. Chairperson Whitton stated he can support this project. Impacts have been treated.

Carlsbad Encina Auto Plaza Specific Plan

Outdoor Lighting Compliance Survey

3. CDP 07-13 - BATIQUITOS INTERCEPTOR SEWER REHABILITATION - Request for a Coastal Development Permit to allow the rehabilitation and ongoing maintenance of 43 existing sewer manholes located within a sewer easement, generally along the north shore of Batiquitos lagoon, between Gabbiano Lane and El Camino Real within Local Facilities Management Zone 19 and the East Batiquitos Lagoon segment of the City’s Local Coastal Program. Resolutions No. 6463, 6464

Batiquitos Interceptor Sewer Rehabilitation Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6463 ADOPTING a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and APPROVE Planning Commission Resolution No. 6464 APPROVING Coastal Development Permit CDP 07-13 based on the finding and subject to the conditions contained therein. Moved by Commissioner Baker, seconded by .

Junior Planner Chris Garcia gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Commissioner Montgomery recused himself from the dias due to being in the noticing area for the project. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of Staff. Commissioner Cardosa asked if the failing condition cause pollution to get into the lagoons. Mr. Garcia stated no and this project is for internal degradtion. Mark Biskup, project Engineer, two manholes per day but should be completed within a 2 month period. Chairperson Whitton asked about any trail damage...Fixed back to its original condition. Commission Boddy asked about the age of the existing manholes. Mr. Biskup stated the current ones...up to 50 years. The method...expect at least 20 years of life for the new manholes. Commissioner Dominguez asked if the existing manholes will simply be sleeved. Mr. Biskup explained. Commssioner Dominguez asked about the duration about doing the work. Birdnesting breeding seasons. Chairperson Whitton opened and closed public testimony.

4. PUD 06-12(A) - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 16 and PUD 06-14(A) - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 18 - Request for a determination that the projects are within the scope of the previously certified Robertson Ranch Master Plan Final Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activities for the purposes of CEQA; and approval of Planned Development Permit Amendments for building elevations and plotting for the development of 85 single-family detached homes within Planning Area (PA) 16 and 110 single-family detached homes within PA 18 of the East Village of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan, generally located north of Cannon Road, west of College Boulevard, and east of future Wind Trail Way in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. Resolutions No. 6461, 6462

Robertson Ranch PA 16 & Robertson Ranch PA 18 Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6461 and 6462 APPROVING Planned Development Permit Amendments PUD 06-12(A) and PUD 06-14(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by .

Commissioner Montgomery returned to the dais. Commissioner Douglas recused herself from the dais due to accepting campaign contributions from the project applicant. Associate Planner Barbara Kennedy gave a detailed presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of Staff. Seeing none, he asked if the applicant if he wished to make a presentation. Paul Klukas, Planning Systems, 1530 Faraday Ave Suite 100, gave a detailed presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Boddy asked if there were any considerations made for the homes to be solar ready. Mr. Klukas stated that Brookfield will exceed the green building requirements. Adam Pevney, from Brookfield Homes, 12865 Point Del Mar, will implement the green building requirements. Currently no plans to stub future solar panels but will stub for solar heating. Commissioner Boddy asked if the conservation is for during the construction or after the homes are built. Water conservation is for post construction. Commissioner Baker asked Mr. Pevney if there are fire retardant protections. Allison Moreland, 415 S Cedros, Solana Beach, stated the wood is a wood laminate.

Commissioner Cardoas asked about the pretreatment of the wrought iron. Mr. Klukas stated he did not know. Mr. Pevney stated typically the wrought iron is galvanized. Chairperson Whitton opened and closed public testimony.

5. SDP 07-05/CDP 07-27 - GARFIELD STREET APARTMENTS - Request for approval of a Site Development Plan and a Coastal Development Permit for the demolition of a single-family residence and detached garage and the construction of a three (3) unit residential apartment complex with a subterranean garage on a .14 acre site generally located on the east side of Garfield Street between Juniper Avenue and Cherry Avenue, in the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 1. Resolutions No. 6458, 6459

Garfield Street Apartments Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6458 and 6459 APPROVING Site Development Plan SDP 07-05 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 07-27 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by .

Vote to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6458 and 6459 APPROVING Site Development Plan SDP 07-05 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 07-27 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. (Approved) (Recorded at 00:12:25)

Commissioner Douglas returned to the dais. Assistant Planner Dan Halverson gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Dominguez asked about the public notice sign being down and if there is a requirement. Mr. Halverson stated he believes there have been instances of the vandalism. Mr. Halverson stated the City does issue an Early Public Notice as well as the noticing for the public hearing. Commissioner Dominguez asked about the height of the building. Chairperson Whitton asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Matthew ??, 2311 Kentner Blvd, San Diego, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked about the solar panels are for heating or electricity. Electricity. Commissioner Boddy inquired about electric cars. Commssioner Baker commented that she really likes the architecture of the project.

Commissioner Douglas announced the Prop D. report. Commissioner Dominguez ... Mr. Neu commented on the appeal of the Boat Club at City Council. Ms. Mobaldi inquired about fees with state legislation...discretionary to defer fees

Sep 17, 2008 Planning Commission Meeting

Full agenda
Share this video

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

Roll call (9 Present, 0 Absent, 0 Excused) (Recorded at 00:04:28)

APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approved: September 3, 2008 (Whitton abstained) (6-0-1)

Motion to approve Minutes from the September 3, 2008 PC hearing. Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by .

PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING

1. PCD 08-02 - NEWPORT AUDIOLOGY CENTERS - Approval of Newport Audiology Centers as an industrial medical use located at 2385 Camino Vida Roble within Local Facilities Management Zone 5 and in the Planned Industrial (P-M) Zone. Resolution No. 6488

Newport Audiology Centers Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6488, APPROVING a Planning Commission determination that Newport Audiology Centers is an industrial medical use and therefore permitted in the Planned Industrial (P-M) Zone based on the findings contained therein. Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by .

Vote to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6488, APPROVING a Planning Commission determination that Newport Audiology Centers is an industrial medical use and therefore permitted in the Planned Industrial (P-M) Zone based on the findings contained therein. (Approved) (Recorded at 00:10:44)

Senior Planner Scott Donnell gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of Staff. Commissioner Boddy asked if the business license could be revoked if the nature of the business significantly changed to become more retail.

2. GPA 07-01/ZC 07-01/LCPA 07-01/SP 07-01/ PDP 01(I)/SDP 07-01/ CDP 07-03 - CARLSBAD ENCINA AUTO PLAZA - Request for a recommendation of adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Addendum; a recommendation of approval for a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan Land Use designation from Planned Industrial/Office to Regional Commercial and Public Utilities, a Zone Change from Planned Industrial/Office to General Commercial and Public Utility, a Local Coastal Program Amendment, a Specific Plan, a Precise Development Plan Amendment, and a Coastal Development Permit and approval of a Site Development Plan to develop a 28.3-acre parcel into four separate parcels for the development of an automotive and other motor vehicles sales facility and a public utility use located on the east side of Avenida Encinas between Palomar Airport Road and Poinsettia Lane in Local Facilities Management Zone 22. Resolutions No. 6445, 6444, 6446, 6447, 6448, 6449, 6450, 6451

Carlsbad Encina Auto Plaza Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6445 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Addendum and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6444, 6446, 6447, 6448, 6449, 6450 and 6451 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of General Plan Amendment 07-01, Zone Change 07-01, Local Coastal Program Amendment 07-01, Specific Plan 07-01, Precise Development Plan Amendment 01(I), and Coastal Development Permit 07-03 and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6450 APPROVING Site Development Plan 07-01, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein including the Errata Sheet. Moved by Commissioner Baker, seconded by .

Vote to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6445 RECOMMENDING ADOPTION of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Addendum and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6444, 6446, 6447, 6448, 6449, 6450 and 6451 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of General Plan Amendment 07-01, Zone Change 07-01, Local Coastal Program Amendment 07-01, Specific Plan 07-01, Precise Development Plan Amendment 01(I), and Coastal Development Permit 07-03 and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6450 APPROVING Site Development Plan 07-01, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein including the Errata Sheet. (Approved) (Recorded at 02:33:00)

Senior Planner Van Lynch responded in detailed to all the issues raised at the previous hearing and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions. Commissioner Baker stated several letters requested that an EIR be prepared for the project. Commissioner Baker asked what an EIR does for the project and if it stops the project from moving forward. Jane Mobaldi, Assistant City Attorney, stated it would prolong the project but it would not stop the project from progressing. There are review periods and response periods that take time. She further stated there must be substantial evidence that the project will result in a significant impact in order to proceed with an EIR. Staff prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration and feels those impacts have been mitigated to the point that will not reach a level of significance. The Commission is allowed to consider credibility of the public, however, public opposition in and of itself is not evidence enough. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any further questions. Seeing none, he asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Jack Henthorn, Henthorn and Associates, Balfour Court, responded to all the issues raised at the previous meeting and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Dr. Rick Tavares, Investigative Science and Engineering, 11444 D Street, Ramona...90 dBA is the point at which earplugs need to be worn, at 3 feet, it would be cause permanent hearing damage. Dr. Tavares gave a detailed presentation regarding noise and lighting and stated he would be available to answer questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Chairperson Whitton asked for a description of the light shields. Dr. Tavares explained the shields. Commissioner Montgomery asked about the lighting being mercury vapor lights compared to the low pressure sodium lights. Commissioner Dominguez asked for a comparison between the existing Car Country Carlsbad and this proposed project. Mr. Hofman stated that there is a condition regarding the lighting and that it cannot change unless it is approved by the Commission. Commissioner Dominguez asked about lighting on the ballard lighting. Mr. Hofman stated those are very detailed questions but the Commission can condition those lights to be shielded.

Commissioner Baker commented about the lighting conditions because only a certain amount of light can escape the site. Mr. Neu stated that the condition that was modified should tie back to the lighting study. There will be a post installation study to verify that. Chairperson Whitton asked about the music on site. Mr. Hofman stated there is a condition where the sound emitted from speakers cannot exceed 3 decibels beyond the amibient. Mr. Neu stated that was included in the Errata Sheet. Commissioner Douglas asked if the level of music would be similar to the Forum shops. Commissioner Douglas asked about the hours of operation. Open for business. Sales are open at 8:00. Deliveries? Will be during business hours. Every effort is made to deliver the vehicles to be during business hours. Designated drop off area for the vehicles. Can hold up to 3 car carrier trucks. Commissioner Douglas stated she wants to ensure all possible actions have been taken so that the residential neighborhoods remain safe. Mr. Hofman stated measures have been taken all along during this project. Chairperson Whitton asked about the deliveries will not unload until site opens. Same with used vehicles. Commissioner Montgomery asked Mr. Hofman to respond to the increased traffic generation. Mr. Hofman stated that in the Circulation Study took into account this project as well as the potential future plans for the area. Three mitigation required. The trips were accounted for and mitigation measures were put in place for this project. The peak trips are lower with less impact to roadways.

Commissioner Montgomery... Mr. Hofman stated that with the proposed mitigation the impacts are less. What benefit is the over the existing. Increase in taxes that the City will get. Commissioner Dominguez asked about the improvements to Avenida Encinas. Mr. Lynch stated that it would be built to full width but only striped to one lane until such a time that warrants. Commissioner Boddy...clarification on traffic increase. Mr. Van Peski stated.... Chairperson Whitton asked about traffic signals. Mr. Van Peski stated the project proposes a traffic signal at the main entrance to the coaster station. Chairperson Whitton acknowledged receipt of the letters and the Errata sheet for the project. Commissioner Montgomery asked for clarification on the remainder parcel. Commissioner Montgomery is concerned with the City carrying the burden of the project. Ms. Mobaldi reminded the Commission that the minor subdivision is not part of the approval tonight. Commissioner Montgomery.... Mr. Neu stated the remainder parcel is of a size and shape that it would not create a dividable lot. Through the SP, the road could be improved now and the applicant can be reimbursement at a later date. Commissioner Montgomery asked if it could go away...The commission does not have any authority to make the remainder parcel go away. The

Mr. Neu stated that Errata does include those provisions. Commissioner Cardosa asked if the reports are public and asked if Mr. Vallone has inspected any of the reports. Mr. Lynch stated no. Chairperson Whitton commented on public testimony. Patricia Sanchez, ??? Franciscan Road, stated that a traffic light is not wanted. The light is light pollution. Ms. Sanchez asked if the light could be angled. Mr. Van Peski stated there is a procedure for shields to be placed on the lights. Bill Wisener, 64?? Surfside Lane, commented on the signage. North and south bound only and not illuminated. Eric Hall, 6459 Franciscan Road, asked if the Commission and Staff had considered the cumulative effects of noise on the surrounding neighborhoods. Has the test track been tested for noise. Horns and decibels levels. Did traffic study contemplate employee trips, patrons coming for sales, deliveries, patrons for service, the variety of the trips per day. Project should have a focused EIR. Mr. Van Lynch deferred to the accoustical engineer. Dr. Tavares stated that cumulative effects were examined. Tommy White, 6453 Franciscan Road, stated the ultra modern design of the project does not belong in this area. Craig Sturgis, 6477 Franciscan Road, stated the train is intermittent unlike the noise from the dealership. Mr. Van Peski stated the SANDAG.....

Ken Vallone, 6462 Franciscan Road, stated that the benefit for the City or the citizens has not been addressed. The operational hours for Office Commercial are less. Against the project. Commissioner Montgomery asked for clarification regarding the intermittent noise of the railroad. Dr. Tavares stated there is also the noise from the PCH, the freeway. The sound on site does not get any lower to the mid 50's. Commissioner Baker asked Staff to discuss the comment period for the Negative declaration. Mr. Lynch stated that throughout the project there have been many notices. CEQA for 30 days.

Commissioner Dominguez asked Ms. Mobaldi about fair argument standards. Ms. Mobaldi stated that the Commission needs to look at the project as a whole..... Commissioner Dominguez asked if there is such a thing as a focused EIR. Mr. Neu stated yes and there would only be those issues that were felt to be pertinent to the project. Mr. Neu pointed out to the Initial Study. The technical studies are not available on the website. DISCUSSION Commissioner Cardosa can support the project as presented. Commissioner Boddy does not see a great benefit to the project and feels the site is properly zoned as it is. Commissioner Douglas stated she is concerned with the proximity to the residential. Commissioner Dominguez stated the dynamics with this project as compared to Car Country Carlsbad is completely different. He further stated he agrees with Commissioner Boddy. Commissioner Baker stated this is a good thing for the City and provides increased sales taxes. She stated the project is conditioned with all the lighting and noise studies. Test garden on rectangular property. She is not objected to this project. Commissioner Montgomery stated he agrees with Commissioner Boddy.Would like to pause and consider effects on the area as a whole. Chairperson Whitton stated he can support this project. Impacts have been treated.

Carlsbad Encina Auto Plaza Specific Plan

Outdoor Lighting Compliance Survey

3. CDP 07-13 - BATIQUITOS INTERCEPTOR SEWER REHABILITATION - Request for a Coastal Development Permit to allow the rehabilitation and ongoing maintenance of 43 existing sewer manholes located within a sewer easement, generally along the north shore of Batiquitos lagoon, between Gabbiano Lane and El Camino Real within Local Facilities Management Zone 19 and the East Batiquitos Lagoon segment of the City’s Local Coastal Program. Resolutions No. 6463, 6464

Batiquitos Interceptor Sewer Rehabilitation Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 6463 ADOPTING a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and APPROVE Planning Commission Resolution No. 6464 APPROVING Coastal Development Permit CDP 07-13 based on the finding and subject to the conditions contained therein. Moved by Commissioner Baker, seconded by .

Junior Planner Chris Garcia gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Commissioner Montgomery recused himself from the dias due to being in the noticing area for the project. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of Staff. Commissioner Cardosa asked if the failing condition cause pollution to get into the lagoons. Mr. Garcia stated no and this project is for internal degradtion. Mark Biskup, project Engineer, two manholes per day but should be completed within a 2 month period. Chairperson Whitton asked about any trail damage...Fixed back to its original condition. Commission Boddy asked about the age of the existing manholes. Mr. Biskup stated the current ones...up to 50 years. The method...expect at least 20 years of life for the new manholes. Commissioner Dominguez asked if the existing manholes will simply be sleeved. Mr. Biskup explained. Commssioner Dominguez asked about the duration about doing the work. Birdnesting breeding seasons. Chairperson Whitton opened and closed public testimony.

4. PUD 06-12(A) - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 16 and PUD 06-14(A) - ROBERTSON RANCH PA 18 - Request for a determination that the projects are within the scope of the previously certified Robertson Ranch Master Plan Final Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activities for the purposes of CEQA; and approval of Planned Development Permit Amendments for building elevations and plotting for the development of 85 single-family detached homes within Planning Area (PA) 16 and 110 single-family detached homes within PA 18 of the East Village of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan, generally located north of Cannon Road, west of College Boulevard, and east of future Wind Trail Way in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. Resolutions No. 6461, 6462

Robertson Ranch PA 16 & Robertson Ranch PA 18 Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6461 and 6462 APPROVING Planned Development Permit Amendments PUD 06-12(A) and PUD 06-14(A) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by .

Commissioner Montgomery returned to the dais. Commissioner Douglas recused herself from the dais due to accepting campaign contributions from the project applicant. Associate Planner Barbara Kennedy gave a detailed presentation and stated she would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of Staff. Seeing none, he asked if the applicant if he wished to make a presentation. Paul Klukas, Planning Systems, 1530 Faraday Ave Suite 100, gave a detailed presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of the applicant. Commissioner Boddy asked if there were any considerations made for the homes to be solar ready. Mr. Klukas stated that Brookfield will exceed the green building requirements. Adam Pevney, from Brookfield Homes, 12865 Point Del Mar, will implement the green building requirements. Currently no plans to stub future solar panels but will stub for solar heating. Commissioner Boddy asked if the conservation is for during the construction or after the homes are built. Water conservation is for post construction. Commissioner Baker asked Mr. Pevney if there are fire retardant protections. Allison Moreland, 415 S Cedros, Solana Beach, stated the wood is a wood laminate.

Commissioner Cardoas asked about the pretreatment of the wrought iron. Mr. Klukas stated he did not know. Mr. Pevney stated typically the wrought iron is galvanized. Chairperson Whitton opened and closed public testimony.

5. SDP 07-05/CDP 07-27 - GARFIELD STREET APARTMENTS - Request for approval of a Site Development Plan and a Coastal Development Permit for the demolition of a single-family residence and detached garage and the construction of a three (3) unit residential apartment complex with a subterranean garage on a .14 acre site generally located on the east side of Garfield Street between Juniper Avenue and Cherry Avenue, in the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program and Local Facilities Management Zone 1. Resolutions No. 6458, 6459

Garfield Street Apartments Staff Report

Motion to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6458 and 6459 APPROVING Site Development Plan SDP 07-05 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 07-27 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by .

Vote to approve that the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 6458 and 6459 APPROVING Site Development Plan SDP 07-05 and Coastal Development Permit CDP 07-27 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. (Approved) (Recorded at 00:12:25)

Commissioner Douglas returned to the dais. Assistant Planner Dan Halverson gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked if there were any questions of staff. Commissioner Dominguez asked about the public notice sign being down and if there is a requirement. Mr. Halverson stated he believes there have been instances of the vandalism. Mr. Halverson stated the City does issue an Early Public Notice as well as the noticing for the public hearing. Commissioner Dominguez asked about the height of the building. Chairperson Whitton asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. Matthew ??, 2311 Kentner Blvd, San Diego, gave a brief presentation and stated he would be available to answer any questions. Chairperson Whitton asked about the solar panels are for heating or electricity. Electricity. Commissioner Boddy inquired about electric cars. Commssioner Baker commented that she really likes the architecture of the project.

Commissioner Douglas announced the Prop D. report. Commissioner Dominguez ... Mr. Neu commented on the appeal of the Boat Club at City Council. Ms. Mobaldi inquired about fees with state legislation...discretionary to defer fees

© 2003-2024 Swagit Productions, LLC