[00:00:01]
CARLSBAD REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AND IT'S NOVEMBER 15TH AND 5 P.M..
[CALL TO ORDER]
SO WE'LL START WITH THE CLERK CALLING ROLL.THAT ALL FIVE MEMBERS ARE PRESENT.
ANNOUNCEMENTS OF CURRENT MEETING.
AND THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ON PUBLIC HEARING, ITEM NUMBER 12.
SO WITH THAT, MR. BLACKBURN, DO YOU LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE? PLEASE JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE TO OUR FLAG.
OKAY, WE DO NOT HAVE ANY MINUTES TONIGHT.
BUT CITY ATTORNEY, IF YOU'D LIKE TO REPORT OUT IN CLOSED SESSION.
THANK YOU, MAYOR. THERE WAS NO REPORTABLE ACTION.
[PRESENTATIONS]
NORBY MAKE THE INTRODUCTIONS.THANK YOU, MAYOR. I'M VERY PLEASED TO DO THIS.
AND AS I PRESENT THIS PROCLAMATION, I'D LIKE TO HAVE [INAUDIBLE] JONES, WHO IS OUR SENIOR PROGRAM MANAGER IN PUBLIC WORKS, COME UP TO THE PODIUM AND THEN WE'LL BE ABLE TO SAY A FEW WORDS AFTERWARDS. SO WHEREAS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD RECOGNIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF PROTECTING AND PRESERVING OUR NATURAL RESOURCES AND ADOPTING CONSCIENTIOUS HABITS THAT WILL IMPROVE OUR DAILY LIVES AND BRING ABOUT A CLEANER, SAFER AND MORE SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT.
AND WHEREAS, THE CITY OF CARLSBAD'S ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDING PRINCIPLES SUPPORT MAXIMIZING RECYCLING IN OUR COMMUNITY AND RECOGNIZE THAT EVERY EFFORT, NO MATTER HOW SMALL, DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE. AND WHEREAS, THE CITY OF CARLSBAD IS LEADING BY EXAMPLE AND IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT INITIATIVES THAT PROMOTE REDUCING, REUSING AND RECYCLING AND REAFFIRM THE CITY'S COMMITMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP.
AND. WHEREAS, KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL HAS AN INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE AMERICA'S RECYCLING DAY, AMERICA RECYCLES DAY ON NOVEMBER 15TH, 2022 AND TODAY WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE IMPORTANCE OF WORKING TOGETHER TO RECYCLE WASTE AND DEVELOP INNOVATIVE WAYS TO MANAGE OUR RESOURCES MORE SUSTAINABLY.
NOW, THEREFORE, I COUNCIL MEMBER PETER NORBY, ON BEHALF OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM NOVEMBER 15TH, 2022, AS AMERICA RECYCLES DAY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. THANK YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER NORBY, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT AND COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY AND THE RESPONSIBLE STEWARDSHIP OF OUR ENVIRONMENT.
LAST DECEMBER, CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A PHASING BAN OF SINGLE USE PLASTIC PRODUCTS.
UNDER THE NEW BAN, SINGLE USE PLASTIC PRODUCTS REFER TO ITEMS THAT ARE DISPOSED OF IMMEDIATELY AFTER USE LIKE PLASTIC BEVERAGE CONTAINERS, BOTTLES, STRAWS, CUPS AND DISPOSABLE PLASTIC BAGS.
LESS THAN 10% OF ALL PLASTICS SOLD IN THE UNITED STATES EACH YEAR IS RECYCLED.
FOR THIS REASON, CARLSBAD SINGLE USE PLASTIC BAN WILL HELP TO REDUCE THOUSANDS OF POUNDS OF UNNECESSARY DISPOSABLE PLASTIC THAT END IN THE OCEAN EVERY YEAR. SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT STAFF HAS BEEN MEETING WITH BUSINESSES TO BRING AWARENESS TO THIS NEW INITIATIVES, AND WE ARE PLEASED TO REPORT THAT THE COMMUNITY IS MAKING THE SHIFT TO SUSTAINABLE ALTERNATIVES THAT INCLUDE REUSABLE AND REFILLABLE OPTIONS.
TODAY WE WANT TO THANK OUR RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES FOR THEIR RECYCLING EFFORTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS, AND ALSO WE CONTINUE TO ENCOURAGE THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY TO PLEDGE TO REDUCE WASTE BY PRODUCTS MADE WITH HIGH RECYCLED CONTENT AND LEARN ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF RECYCLING.
IT'S MY PLEASURE TO READ THE PROCLAMATION FOR THE SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY.
[00:05:04]
PATRONIZING CARLSBAD SMALL BUSINESSES YIELDS LOCAL ECONOMIC BENEFIT, WITH DOLLAR SPENT STAYING IN OUR COMMUNITY PROMOTING VIBRANT COMMUNITIES. 96% OF CONSUMERS WHO SHOP ON SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY REPORT THAT DAY MAKES THEM WANT TO SHOP OR EAT AT SMALL, INDEPENDENTLY OWNED BUSINESSES ALL YEAR LONG, NOT JUST DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON.ACCORDING TO THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, THERE ARE 30.2 MILLION SMALL BUSINESSES IN THE UNITED STATES, EMPLOYING AN ESTIMATED 47 AND A HALF PERCENT OF THE EMPLOYEES IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR.
AND THANK YOU FOR WHAT YOU DO.
AND I AND EVERY YEAR I ALWAYS MAKE THE SAME COMMENT.
SO WOULD LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING.
EVERYTHING FROM THE ECONOMIC SUBCOMMITTEE THAT WE GET TO INTERACT WITH ON A VERY REGULAR BASIS TO OUR INTERACTION WITH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HERE AND ALL THAT THE CITY DOES IS VERY MUCH APPRECIATED FOR OUR COMMUNITY, OUR BUSINESSES.
AND OF COURSE, CHRISTINE HAS A GREAT EVENT COMING UP THAT I'D LOVE FOR HER TO SHARE ABOUT.
YES THANK YOU EVERYONE, FOR BEING SO SUPPORTIVE OF OUR SMALL BUSINESSES IN CARLSBAD, ESPECIALLY CARLSBAD VILLAGE IS NEAR AND DEAR TO MY HEART. I USED TO BE A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER RIGHT ON STATE STREET.
SO THIS IS KIND OF PERSONAL AND I ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT.
AND WE ARE GIVING AWAY $1,500 WORTH OF GIFT CARDS TO OUR RESTAURANTS IN THE VILLAGE.
SHOPPING, PASSPORTS, PHOTO CONTEST, LIVE MUSIC.
JUST COME DOWN AND ENJOY THE VILLAGE AND BLESS ALL THE SMALL BUSINESSES AND LIKE I SAID, SHOP IN CARLSBAD AND LEAVE THE BIG STORES FOR ANOTHER DAY, SOME OTHER DAY, NOT ON SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 26.
THANK YOU. COULD YOU SAY THE DATE ONE MORE TIME? I DIDN'T QUITE HEAR IT.
OKAY, SO IT'S THINK OF THANKSGIVING AND THEN YOU HAVE THAT HORRIBLE ONE, BLACK FRIDAY, AND THEN COME DOWN AND SHOP AND SHOP THROUGHOUT ALL OF CARLSBAD. OKAY.
[PUBLIC COMMENT]
PLEASE TREAT OTHERS WITH COURTESY, CIVILITY AND RESPECT.THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE COMMENTS AS REQUESTED.
UP TO A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES IN THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING.
ALL OTHER NON AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE HEARD AT THE END OF THE MEETING.
IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE BROWN ACT.
NO ACTION CAN OCCUR ON THESE ITEMS. WE WELCOME CLAPPING DURING THE CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
YES, MAYOR. THE FIRST SPEAKER IS MARY LUCET, FOLLOWED BY GLENN BERNARD.
THANK YOU, MAYOR MATT HALL, FOR YOUR SERVICE.
NOW, IF WE COULD JUST GET YOU ON BOARD FOR THE SENIOR CENTER.
UNFORTUNATELY, IT HAS GONE DOWNHILL.
AND THE CITY OF VISTA HAS DECIDED THAT NO ONE PERSON BATS A THOUSAND.
SO THEY'VE DECIDED TO HAVE OVERSIGHT, DISCUSSING WHETHER SOMETHING IS A GOOD IDEA OR A BAD IDEA.
THAT MAY OR MAY NOT ALWAYS WORK.
YOU DON'T EVEN BUY LETTUCE FOR THE SENIOR CENTER.
YOU CAN'T BRING IN YOUR OWN FOOD AT THE FORMER DINING ROOM.
[00:10:04]
BUT WORST OF ALL, THEY CONCENTRATE ON THE MONEY AND NOT ON THE SERVING SENIORS.THERE'S GOT TO BE A BALANCE FOR SENIORS TO GO AND SIT AND PLAY CARDS AND USE THE DINING ROOM.
IF YOU HAVE MANAGEMENT THAT IS OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE ABOUT, OH, NO, CAFETERIA IS JUST FOR EATING THE FOOD WE PREPARE AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO GIVE YOU ANYTHING ELSE.
THAT DOESN'T WARM THE HEART OF SENIORS AND MAKE THEM FEEL COMFORTABLE TO GO AND USE THE FACILITY.
SO MAYOR MATT, YOU HAVE A GOOD LEGACY FOR BUSINESS.
BUT YOU NEED TO DO SOMETHING TO SERVE THE THE PEOPLE.
AND BY THE WAY, PARK AND REC MAY BRING IN A LOT OF MONEY FOR THE CITY, BUT THEY'RE NOT HELPING THE METHANE GAS IN THE ENVIRONMENT.
THEY CAN'T SEEM TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO WASH DISHES OR FLATWARE.
DO YOU KNOW HOW ANNOYING IT IS TO USE PLASTIC KNIVES AND FORKS? BUT WORSE IS THE ATTITUDE.
WE DON'T WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU.
ONE PERSON CAN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT, AND IF THEY CHANGE UP AND SELL THINGS AND GET RID OF THINGS OR DECIDE THAT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BUY PUZZLES OR YAHTZEE CARDS.
WELL, THEN THEY'RE JUST NOT GOING TO DO IT.
AND KYLE LANCASTER DOES NOT SUPERVISE THEM.
MICK CALARCO DOES NOT SUPERVISE THEM.
AND WHO HAS CAUSED UTTER CHAOS.
SO, MATT, WHY DON'T YOU TELL PEOPLE TO BRING TOYS, GIFTS, PUZZLES, BACKGAMMON GAMES FOR THE SENIORS AT THE SENIOR CENTER? AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.
THE NEXT SPEAKER IS GLEN BARNARD.
THE SENIOR CENTER IS WONDERFUL.
THE STAFF THERE IS WONDERFUL, THE SERVICES ARE WONDERFUL.
SO THANKS. AND CONGRATULATIONS TO THE TWO MAYORS THAT ARE SITTING UP THERE.
TO NOW, MOVING ON TO TWO PRESIDENTS.
I'M THINKING OF JFK TODAY BECAUSE A COUPLE MISSILES WENT INTO POLAND FROM RUSSIA.
JFK SUPERVISED AN AMERICAN MILITARY BASE 60 YEARS AGO.
A COUPLE GENERALS GAVE HIM A TOUR, TALKED ABOUT THIS FANTASTIC WEAPON RIGHT THERE.
I DON'T WANT A SECOND LIEUTENANT TO START WORLD WAR THREE.
NOW, MOVE ON TO A COUPLE OF THINGS.
I'M GOING TO CONNECT DEFUND THE POLICE WITH STAND YOUR GROUND.
YOU THINK ABOUT SOMETHING LONG ENOUGH, YOU START THINKING OF FUNNY THINGS.
POSSIBLY ARCHIE BUNKER, TV SHOW ALL IN THE FAMILY, CRAZY GUY . TO DEAL WITH AIRPLANE HIJACKINGS, HE ONCE SAID THAT HE WANTS EVERYBODY BOARDING A PLANE TO BE HANDED A PISTOL TO DEAL WITH HIJACKING. AND A FRIEND OF MINE RECENTLY BOUGHT A SIGN FOR HER WINDOW AT HER HOUSE.
IT SAYS, WE DON'T DIAL 911 FROM THIS FROM THIS HOUSE.
AND THERE'S A PICTURE OF A HAND HOLDING A PISTOL IN THEIR WINDOW.
SO IT USED TO BE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH SIGNS.
BUT IT'D BE GREAT IF IT SAID WARNING, 20 REGISTERED WEAPONS ARE ON THIS STREET.
THAT WOULD BE MUCH BETTER THAN NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH AND STAND YOUR GROUND.
IF THIS CITY WOULD PLEASE PASS AN ORDINANCE LIKE CITIES ARE FREE TO DO.
LIKE I GUESS ENCINITAS IS BRAGGING.
HEY, COME AND GET YOUR ABORTIONS IN ENCINITAS.
[00:15:01]
IF THAT WERE TO ACTUALLY HAPPEN THINK OF THE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT ARE NOT SPENT ON A POLICE FORCE.THE POLICE FORCE DIDN'T DO MUCH GOOD FOR THAT LADY THAT GOT STABBED TO DEATH ON ARGOSY.
BUT WOULDN'T IT BE COOL IF ALL THESE HOUSES, EVERY HOUSE HAD PISTOLS IN THEM, PAID FOR BY THE MONEY SAVED FROM NOT PAYING POLICE? THANK YOU.
THAT CONCLUDES ALL OF OUR SPEAKERS MAYOR.
OK, MOVING ON TO THE CONSENT CALENDARS.
[CONSENT CALENDAR]
ITEM ONE THROUGH NINE.I KNOW, MR. BLACKBURN, YOU WANT TO NOT VOTE ON ITEM FOUR.
SPEAKERS. DO WE HAVE SPEAKERS ON CONSENT CALENDAR?
[6. ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THE 2021 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CIP PROJECT NO. 6002-21]
YES, MAYOR. WE HAVE ONE ON ITEM SIX.GLENN BERNARD. MR. MAYOR, ABOUT A YEAR AGO, THERE WAS A MEETING OVER A FARADAY AND CITY EMPLOYEES HIGH RANKING, AND THERE'S TOO MANY OF THEM, BY THE WAY.
BUT ONE OF THEM MADE A PRESENTATION ABOUT CURBS AND SIDEWALKS NEEDED WHERE THERE ARE NONE.
AND HE GETS CALLED BACK FROM TIME TO TIME TO WORK ON THESE TERRIFIC PROJECTS.
AND HE DID SOMETHING IN THIS PAST YEAR.
BUT I'M OLD AND I CAN'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHAT THAT WAS.
THERE ARE ABOUT NINE OR TEN OF THEM.
IT WAS THERE. NUMBER ONE FROM ERIK LARSON'S THEME.
WELL, THAT'S TERRIFIC IF YOU LIVE IN THE FRONT ROW.
I LOVE HAVING RICH PEOPLE IN MY CITY.
I LOVE RICH PEOPLE EVERYWHERE.
THERE'S PLENTY OF WONDERFUL STREETS THAT HAVE NO CURBS AND NO SIDEWALKS.
AND WHEN THAT LADY MADE HER PRESENTATION A YEAR AGO MR. MAYOR. I REMEMBER THAT YOU, THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS WHERE THERE ARE CURRENTLY IS BEACH FEEL.
YOU SAID IF YOU GO INTO THOSE AREAS, YOU'RE GOING TO ENCOUNTER SOME RESISTANCE.
AND I APPRECIATE THE WARNING THAT YOU GAVE.
OH, AND I DON'T. AND I LIVE ON A VANILLA STREET.
I HAVE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS, BUT I LOVE SUNNY HILLS, SKYLINE, HIGHLAND, LOVE WALKING THEM.
ESPECIALLY WHEN I'M CARRYING A CAMPAIGN SIGN, BUT EVEN WHEN I'M NOT, THEY'RE FUN TO BE ON.
THEY DEFINITELY HAVE BEACH FEEL AND CONNECTEDNESS.
NOW, MAYBE THIS WOMAN GOT HIRED AFTER ERIC LARSEN'S WONDERFUL COMMISSION DID THEIR WORK.
SHE'S CLUELESS AND DOESN'T HAVE RESPECT FOR WHAT THESE PEOPLE HAVE PURCHASED.
IF I WAS LIVING IN ONE OF THOSE HOMES, I WOULD FIGHT LIKE HECK.
IF MACHINERY SHOWS UP TO MAKE MY STREET VANILLA BY BRINGING IN CURBS AND SIDEWALKS.
SO I'D LIKE YOU TO PULL THIS THING, NOT PASS IT, AND MAYBE ELIMINATE THAT POSITION FROM CITY EMPLOYMENT. THAT CONCLUDES ALL OF OUR SPEAKERS.
THOSE ARE THE SPEAKERS ON CONSENT CALENDAR.
I WOULD LIKE TO PULL ITEM FIVE FOR DISCUSSION.
[5. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY ALONG EL CAMINO REAL FROM SUNNY CREEK ROAD TO JACKSPAR DRIVE FOR WIDENING EL CAMINO REAL, CIP PROJECT NO. 6094]
SO WITH THAT WE HAVE ITEMS ONE THROUGH NINE.AM I CORRECT? MR. BLACKBURN, YOU'RE NOT VOTING ON ITEM FOUR? YES. I HAVE TO ABSTAIN FROM ITEM NUMBER FOUR.
ANY OTHER ITEMS TO PULL? MOTION.
MOVE APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ONE THROUGH NINE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF I'M SORRY, YOU SAID FIVE? FIVE. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF NUMBER FIVE SECOND.
OKAY. THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM FIVE, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER.
YOU WANT TO MAKE INTRODUCTIONS ON THIS? THANK YOU, MAYOR. I'D LIKE TO INVITE UP ENGINEERING MANAGER HUSSEIN RJD TO DISCUSS THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY ALONG EL CAMINO REAL FROM SONNY CREEK ROAD TO JACKS BAR DRIVE.
GOOD EVENING, MAYOR. MAYOR PRO TEM, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
MY NAME IS HOSSEIN AJIDEH. I'M AN INJURY MANAGER WITHIN PUBLIC WORKS BRANCH.
[00:20:05]
STAFF REPORTS.IF YOU WOULD LIKE, I'D BE HAPPY TO PROVIDE YOU IF YOU'D LIKE, IF YOU WANT A PRESENTATION.
CORRECT. FOR THE FOR THE PURPOSE OF WIDENING EL CAMINO REAL.
IN THE PAST, IS IT NOT PART OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT THAT WHEN AN ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER WHO HAS THE ABILITY TO DEVELOP HIS PROPERTY, DO THEY NOT PAY FOR THAT THIRD LANE? THAT'S CORRECT.
BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE, WHICH IS BASED BASICALLY WITH MY PREVIOUS CITIES, TYPICALLY WHEN DEVELOPERS COME TO THE CITY AND SEEK APPROVAL FOR THEIR PROJECTS THROUGH THE ENTITLEMENT PROCESS, LIKE YOU MENTIONED, THEY ARE CONDITIONED TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THEIR IMPROVED PROJECTS FRONTAGE.
IN THIS CASE, BECAUSE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, NO DEVELOPER HAS COME TO THE CITY SEEKING APPROVAL AND BECAUSE THE PROJECT HAS BEEN EXPEDITED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
SO THAT'S WHY CITY IS BASICALLY MOVING FORWARD WITH THE LOCAL FUNDS.
THIS ITEM, LIKE YOU MENTIONED, IS NOT REALLY APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT OR EVEN PAYING THE DEVELOPERS.
IT'S JUST AUTHORIZING ITS STAFF TO NEGOTIATE WITH THEM.
SO I UNDERSTAND THE NEED TO WIDEN EL CAMINO REAL, BUT THE INTENT OF THIS MOTION IS TO GIVE YOU THE AUTHORITY TO GO TO THE PROPERTY OWNER TO TRY AND PURCHASE THE RIGHT OF WAY.
IS THAT NOT CORRECT? ULTIMATELY, THAT'S CORRECT.
BUT FOR THIS ITEM IS JUST AUTHORIZING US TO NEGOTIATE WITH THEM AND COME TO AN AGREEMENT.
YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZING US TO PURCHASE IT NOW.
WE WILL COME BACK TO THIS COUNCIL TO GET AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYING THEM AND PURCHASING THE LAND.
I'M JUST I USE THE WORD INTENT.
SO FOLLOWING THE IDEA OF THE INTENT AND THIS IS WHERE I QUESTION THE FAIRNESS IS THE INTENT IS TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY AND FOR THE CITY TO BUILD THAT LANE OF TRAFFIC, IS IT NOT? THAT'S CORRECT. IT'S BASICALLY WIDENING THE ROAD TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN.
THIS IS ONE OF THE LAST FEW SEGMENTS THAT NEEDS TO BE WIDENED ON EL CAMINO REAL.
SO FOLLOWING THE INTENT, HOW MUCH MONEY DO YOU THINK MIGHT BE TO BUILD THAT THIRD LANE AND THAT WOULD BE ABSORBED BY THE CITY I ASSUME UNDER THIS.
IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ABSORBED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY.
IF WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS PLAN.
YES. AND SO HOW MUCH MONEY IS THAT? ANY IDEA? I DON'T HAVE REALLY THE COST ESTIMATE SPECIFICALLY TO CONSTRUCT THAT THIRD LANE.
BUT FOR THIS ITEM IS $127 ESTIMATED PROPERTY VALUE.
BUT WE CAN COME BACK AND PROVIDE EXACT COST ESTIMATE TO BUILD A THIRD THROUGH LANE.
AND I UNDERSTAND THAT'S NOT PART OF TONIGHT.
THAT'S SOME NUMBER YOU WILL COME UP WITH.
SO PART OF WHAT FOR ME IS AND BEING PART OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND IT REALLY IS A FAIRNESS QUESTION BECAUSE WHEN YOU THINK OF EL CAMINO REAL AND THE THIRD LANE OF EL CAMINO REAL ON BOTH SIDES FROM ONE END OF THE CITY TO THE OTHER, ALMOST ALL OF THAT, EXCEPT FOR WHERE THERE HAS BEEN OPEN SPACE, HAS BEEN.
DEVELOPED BY A DEVELOPER, HAS IT NOT? I HAVE TO COME BACK WITH YOU.
I DON'T REALLY KNOW THE ANSWER FOR THAT QUESTION.
YOU MIGHT SAY SO, AND I COULD POSSIBLY BE INCORRECT.
YOU KNOW, MY MEMORY IS STARTING TO FADE A BIT.
AND I UNDERSTAND THE NEED FOR THE ROAD, BUT ALSO UNDERSTAND GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND THE FAIRNESS QUESTION THAT WE'VE ASKED NUMEROUS DEVELOPERS THROUGHOUT THE CITY, NOT JUST ON EL CAMINO REAL.
I MEAN, IN FACT, THEY BUILT MELROSE, THEY'VE DONE RANCHO SANTA FE.
I MEAN, THEY'VE ALWAYS PUT THE MONEY UP FRONT.
[00:25:02]
AND NOW I KNOW WE'RE GETTING CLOSE TO THE END.AND IT MEETS THE FAIRNESS QUESTION.
PAZ DO YOU WANT TO COMMENT? YES, SIR. PAZ GOMEZ, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER FOR PUBLIC WORKS.
AND I JUST WANTED TO ADD IN THAT THIS IS ONE OF THE ITEMS, AS MR. AJIDEH HAD MENTIONED, THAT IS PART OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
WE HAVE BROUGHT THIS PROJECT FORWARD FOR CITY COUNCIL AND WE HAVE LOOKED AT OTHER FUNDING SOURCES BECAUSE WE ARE TARGETING, AS YOU HAD MENTIONED, MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, POSSIBLY INTO 3 TO $4 MILLION RANGE AT THIS POINT FOR THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE WIDENING OF THAT OF EL CAMINO REAL. SO THIS WILL BE THE NEXT STEP.
AND THE POINT THAT YOU'RE MAKING ABOUT DEVELOPERS BEING THE ONES THAT HAVE FUNDED IT, THIS WAS A SEPARATE DIRECTION THAT THAT WAS PROVIDED WITH REGARD TO THE FUNDING SOURCE.
AND I BELIEVE WE LOOKED AT OTHER FUNDING SOURCES.
THAT'S WHAT I BASICALLY LOOKED AT AND OTHER FUNDING SOURCES.
AND SO AT THIS POINT, BASICALLY IT'S FUNDED BY CITY FUNDS.
I'M SORRY. I DIDN'T HEAR I DIDN'T HEAR THAT ANSWER.
I SAID BASICALLY, RIGHT NOW THE PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE CITY FUNDS.
THERE IS NO DEVELOPERS IMPACT FEE CONTRIBUTING TO THE FUND FOR THIS PROJECT AT THIS POINT.
SO THAT THEREIN LIES MY CONCERN AND MY QUESTION.
YOU KNOW, ONE IS THE FAIRNESS OF WHAT PRIOR DEVELOPERS HAD TO DO.
SECOND IS, AT THE END OF THE DAY AND I'M SORRY, WHAT WAS THE NUMBER YOU USED? FOUR OR 5 MILLION. I HEAR YOU SAY ABOUT 3 TO $4 MILLION.
TO ME, I'M HAVING A HARD TIME TRYING TO GET MYSELF TO A POSITIVE ON THIS.
SO I GUESS I WOULD OPEN UP TO MY COLLEAGUES TO SEE IF YOU HAVE THOUGHTS.
FOLLOWING. THANK YOU. FOLLOWING ALONG THE SAME LINES.
IS THE ROAD WIDENING DONE TO THE BENEFIT OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ONE, TWO OR THREE FUTURE PROJECTS THAT ARE GOING TO HAPPEN AROUND THERE? IN OTHER WORDS, DO THE THESE PROJECTS NEED THE CAPACITY THAT AN EXTRA LANE WOULD PROVIDE? SO IS IT BEING DONE FOR A VERY SMALL SET OF PROJECTS OR IS IT BEING DONE FOR THE GENERAL GOOD OF EVERYBODY WHO USES EL CAMINO REAL? AND IT'S A PINCH POINT RIGHT THERE.
THAT'S A BOTTLENECK RIGHT NOW.
SO EXISTING TRAFFIC REQUIRES WIDENING THE ROAD.
LIKE I SAID, THIS IS ONE OF THE LAST FEW SEGMENTS THAT NEEDS TO BE WIDENED.
THANK YOU. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT HAD BEEN BROUGHT FORWARD IS AS PART OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, WHEN THERE IS A DEFICIENT SEGMENT THAT WE BRING FORWARD, WE BRING IT FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL.
AND THIS IS ONE OF THOSE SEGMENTS.
WAS THAT ALL DEVELOPER MONEY OR WAS IT TRANSNET MONEY AND GENERAL FUND MONEY AND DIFFERENT SOURCES TO DO THAT VERY EXPENSIVE PROJECT? I HAVE TO GET BACK WITH YOU WITH THAT INFORMATION.
OKAY. THANK YOU. JUST JUST TO ADD WHAT MS. GOMEZ SAID REGARDING GENERAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, WHEN WE WERE HERE TWO YEARS AGO AND PRESENTED 2019 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, BASICALLY MONITORING REPORT, THIS PROJECT WAS ONE OF THE PROJECTS THAT BACK THEN COUNCIL ASK STAFF TO MOVE FORWARD WITH.
THANK YOU. YES, I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT POINT.
AND IT'S A LITTLE QUIET WHEN YOU SPEAK, MR. AJIDEH, SO JUST, YEAH, IT'S OKAY.
IT'S THAT MIC, I THINK, IS ALWAYS LIKE THAT.
JUST TO CLARIFY ONE MORE TIME, HOW LONG IS THIS PROJECT BEEN ON THE BOOKS AND BEEN APPROVED BY COUNCIL? BECAUSE I GATHER IT'S BEEN GENERAL PLAN AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT MAYBE.
AND IT'S I KNOW IT CAME TO US IN 2021 AS WELL.
SO IF YOU COULD HELP CLARIFY THE TIMELINE OF THAT.
[00:30:04]
ECR. GREAT.THAT'S HELPFUL. MR. BLACKBURN. I'M NOT GOING TO TRY TO PUT WORDS IN THE MAYOR'S MOUTH, BUT HE MADE ME THINK OF WHAT WHAT I INTERPRETED HIS QUESTION TO BE.
IS THERE A DISTINCT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO? THE WE HAVE NOT GONE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER YET.
THIS IS THE REQUESTING TO AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE WITH A PROPERTY OWNER.
BUT CORRECT IT IS THE CITY INITIATING THE EFFORT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH IT.
AM I CORRECT? THE REASON WHY WE MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS WAS PER THE DIRECTION FROM CITY COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PROJECT, WHICH WILL HELP WITH THE CAPACITY.
AND SO WE HAVE MOVED FORWARD WITH THIS EFFORT AND WE ARE AT THE POINT NOW TO NEGOTIATE FOR WHAT IS NEEDED FOR THE PROJECT.
RIGHT. SO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING FOR THIS VERSUS US PAYING FOR IT.
OH, I'M SORRY. SO BUT IN THIS CASE THEY DIDN'T COME TO US.
IS THAT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHEN WE MAKE A DEVELOPER PAY VERSUS WHEN WE PAY? SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS, WAS IT DEVELOPER LED OR WAS IT CITY LED? IN THIS CASE, IT'S CITY LED AND THAT'S WHY WE ARE A DEVELOPER DID NOT COME TO US AND STATED IT WAS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL.
FOR EXAMPLE, THIS IS A CIP PROJECT THAT THE CITY'S MOVING FORWARD WITH.
OKAY, SO NOW IF THE CITY PAYS FOR THIS AND THEN THIS PROPERTY OWNER COMES TO US IN A YEAR AND SAYS, NOW I HAVE A PROJECT I WANT TO PRESENT, WILL THEY BE RESPONSIBLE TO THEN REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR THAT ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT WE DID WITH THE CITY, WITH THE CITY PAYING FOR IT? WOULD IS IT LIKE RETROACTIVE? GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR.
TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION IS NO, THEY COULD NOT WE WOULD NOT GET REIMBURSED FOR THESE COSTS.
AS AS MS. GOMEZ MENTIONED, THIS IS A CITY LED PROJECT.
SO TO THE MAYOR'S POINT AND TO YOUR POINT, MAYOR PRO TEM, THE BIG DIFFERENCE HERE IS, AS WE'VE HEARD BEFORE, THROUGH OUR GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE DEVELOPERS HAVE PAID FOR SIGNIFICANT PORTIONS OF THE CITY'S INFRASTRUCTURE THROUGH ITS DEVELOPMENT.
THESE ARE REALLY THE LAST THREE REMAINING GAPS OR SEGMENTS WHERE WE'RE WIDENING EL CAMINO REAL TO BE THE FULL THREE WIDTHS IN EACH DIRECTION, PLUS BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS.
SO AS MENTIONED, PART OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, THESE SEGMENTS WERE FOUND DEFICIENT.
SO IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THESE DEFICIENCIES, THE CITY ELECTED TO EXPEDITE THESE PROJECTS.
SO YEAH, ONCE WE IF WE DO AGREE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH GETTING THE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY AND THEN COUNCIL APPROVES THE PROJECT, WE WILL NO LONGER BE ABLE TO EXTRACT THAT COST FROM THE DEVELOPER.
THAT WAS MR. TOM FRANK. EXCUSE ME FOR NOT INTRODUCING MYSELF YET.
TOM FRANK, TRANSPORTATION DIRECTOR AND CITY ENGINEER.
AND JUST IT'S BEEN MENTIONED BY PRIOR HERE BY ANOTHER COUNCIL MEMBER.
BUT WAS THIS NOT A JOINT AND A PIECE OF PROPERTY WHERE THEY WERE ASKING TO BE PART OF THE UPDATE IN THE PLAN TO GET A HIGHER DENSITY? YOU'RE REFERRING TO THE HOUSING ELEMENT.
AND IF MR. MURPHY COULD COME UP, PLEASE.
GOOD EVENING FOR OUR RECORD, JEFF MURPHY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR.
[00:35:05]
WE HAD THREE OF THOSE MEETINGS.AND THESE THIS PROPERTY WAS NOT INCLUDED ON EITHER MAP.
SO KIND OF THE TRAIN HAS LEFT THE STATION WITH REGARD TO OUR ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT AND TO DELAY IT COULD POTENTIALLY DELAY OUR ABILITY TO MEET STATE DEADLINES ON OUR HOUSING ELEMENT. SO OUR RECOMMENDATION IS NOT TO INCLUDE THIS PROPERTY.
OKAY. ANY FINAL COMMENTS? YOU KNOW, I WOULD JUST OFFER A COMMENT THAT MOST LIKELY FOR THE NEXT UNICYCLE WILL APPEAR ON A MAP.
AND AND, YOU KNOW, WE'LL THE COUNCIL WILL DECIDE WHETHER THAT'S INCLUDED.
BUT THE OWNER HAS STATED HIS INTENT.
AND SO I GUESS WE JUST HAVE TO LOOK AT THIS IF WE'RE.
ANY OTHER FINAL COMMENTS? MOTION, PLEASE. MOVE APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NUMBER FIVE.
OKAY. MOVING ON TO ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION.
[10. INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE TO REDUCE SPEED LIMITS ON PORTIONS OF CADENCIA STREET AND GATEWAY ROAD]
INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE TO REDUCE THE SPEED LIMITS ON PORTIONS OF CADENCE'S STREET IN GATEWAY ROAD.YOU WANT TO MAKE THE INTRODUCTIONS ON THIS? THANK YOU, MAYOR. I'D LIKE TO INVITE THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER, JOHN KIM TO MAKE THE PRESENTATION.
MAYOR PRO TEM, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
I'M JOHN KIM, CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER, AND I'M HERE TO MAKE THIS PRESENTATION.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ITEM IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE ACTION ITEM IDENTIFIED IN THE SAFER STREETS TOGETHER PLAN THAT WOULD REVIEW CITYWIDE SPEED LIMITS FOR POTENTIAL REDUCTION AS A RESULT OF ASSEMBLY BILL 43.
GATEWAY ROAD IS A LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD STREET DESCRIBED IN THE CITY'S MOBILITY ELEMENT.
IT HAS ONE VEHICLE LANE AND ONE BIKE LANE IN EACH DIRECTION.
THE EXISTING SPEED LIMIT ON THIS PORTION OF GATEWAY ROAD IS 40 MILES PER HOUR.
IN 2018, A RAISED CROSSWALK WITH RECTANGULAR, RAPID FLASHING BEACONS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS RRFBS WAS INSTALLED ON GATEWAY ROAD BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL AND CAMPBELL DRIVE.
AFTER INSTALLATION OF THE PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED TRAFFIC CALMING FEATURES.
A NEW TRAFFIC STUDY WAS CONDUCTED INCLUDING SPEED MEASUREMENTS.
ADJACENT LAND USES ON THIS PORTION OF CADENCIA INCLUDE SINGLE AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES AND THE SPEED LIMIT ON THIS PORTION OF CADENCIA STREET IS ALSO 40 MILES PER HOUR.
IN 2021 IN RESPONSE TO RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS ABOUT SPEEDING.
THREE PERMANENT RADAR SPEED FEEDBACK SIGNS WERE INSTALLED.
[00:40:12]
THIS MAP HIGHLIGHTS THE SEGMENT IN QUESTION WITH THE PROPOSED FEATURES THAT WERE INSTALLED.THAT CONCLUDES THE STAFF REPORT, AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT.
ANY SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? THERE ARE NO SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM.
QUESTIONS. YOU WANT TO TITLE THE ORDINANCE? THANK YOU, MAYOR. THIS IS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE TEN, CHAPTER 10.44, SECTIONS 10.44200 AND 10.44830 OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY REDUCING SPEED LIMITS ALONG PORTIONS OF CADENCIA STREET AND GATEWAY ROAD. MOVE INTRODUCTION TO THE ORDINANCE CONTAINED AN AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TEN.
THAT ITEM PASSES UNANIMOUSLY, MOVING ALONG FOUR ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION.
ITEM NUMBER 11, ORDINANCE NUMBER CS-439.
[11. ORDINANCE NO. CS-439 - ZONING CHANGES TO CITYWIDE ZONING MAP]
ZONING CHANGE TO CITYWIDE ZONING MAP.DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS? WE DO NOT HAVE ANY SPEAKERS MAYOR.
WANT TO TITLE THE ORDINANCE. THANK YOU, MAYOR.
THIS IS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE AMENDMENT TO THE CITYWIDE ZONING MAP FROM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY, MULTIPLE ZONE RDM TO RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL WITH A QUALIFIED OVERLAY DEVELOPMENT ZONE.
RPQ ON 0.16 ACRE PARCEL, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 2754 JEFFERSON STREET.
APN 203-201-01-00 IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE ONE.
MOVE ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE CONTAINED IN AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 11.
[12. CARLSBAD HOUSING AGENCY’S REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN FOR THE HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM]
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER.GOOD EVENING, CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
TONIGHT I'M PRESENTING THE CARLSBAD HOUSING AGENCIES ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN UPDATE.
THIS EVENING WE WILL START WITH AN OVERVIEW.
PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL REGULATIONS THAT GOVERN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER PROGRAM, EVERY HOUSING AUTHORITY ACROSS THE COUNTRY IS REQUIRED TO PRODUCE AND UPDATE AN ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN FOR THIS PROGRAM.
THE HOUSING COMMISSION, WHICH MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON HOUSING RELATED MATTERS, REVIEWED THE DRAFT REVISIONS AT A PUBLIC MEETING ON OCTOBER 13, 2022, AND THEY VOTED TO RECOMMEND THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION APPROVE THE REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN.
THE REVISIONS CONTAINED IN THIS UPDATE ARE RELATIVELY MINOR IN NATURE AND ARE NOT CONSIDERED A SIGNIFICANT AMENDMENT, AS THEY DO NOT SIGNIFICANTLY OR NEGATIVELY IMPACT A MAJORITY OF THE PROGRAM'S PARTICIPANTS OR APPLICANTS.
THE UPDATED VERSION IS DESIGNED TO BE MORE USER FRIENDLY.
IT PROVIDES CORRECTIONS AND HUD REQUIRED UPDATES, AND IT STREAMLINES ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES.
WE'VE ALSO ADDED LANGUAGE IN THE VOUCHER TERM LIMIT AND ADDITIONAL 60 DAYS EXTENSION PROVIDED TO ALL ELIGIBLE VOUCHER HOLDERS BASED ON THE LOCAL CARLSBAD RENTAL MARKET CONDITIONS. WE'VE ALSO CHANGED THE ANNUAL HCS INSPECTIONS TO BIANNUAL.
CHA HAS OPTED TO ALLOW FOR BIANNUAL HOUSING QUALITY STANDARDS INSPECTIONS TO STREAMLINE THE ADMINISTRATION AND TO REDUCE TIME COMMITMENTS BY PARTICIPANTS AND RENTAL HOUSING OWNERS. AT A MINIMUM, EACH HOUSING UNIT UNDER CONTRACT WILL BE INSPECTED WITHIN 24 MONTHS OF THE PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED INSPECTION.
[00:45:07]
HAVING SAID ALL OF THAT, OUR FINAL STEP TODAY IS YOUR YOUR ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CARLSBAD HOUSING AGENCY'S REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN FOR THE HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'D LIKE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME.
THERE ARE NO SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM.
SEEING NO ONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK.
I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
QUESTIONS? OKAY WITH THAT, THEN WE.
WE NEED TO GET ANY FINAL COMMENTS.
MR. BLACKBURN. MOVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 12.
[13. CONSIDERATION OF A STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO DISCONTINUE EFFORTS TO INCLUDE LOT 11 AS A POTENTIAL SERVICE CENTER LOCATION IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH SDG&E AND NRG ENERGY ]
MOVING ON, DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS ITEM 13, CONSIDERATION OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO DISCONTINUE EFFORTS TO INCLUDE LOT 11 AS A POTENTIAL SERVICE CENTER LOCATION IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH STG AND E AND NRG.OKAY, YOU'LL BE STEPPING DOWN.
SO WHEN MR. NORBY LEAVES THE ROOM.
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, IF YOU WANT TO MAKE THE INTRODUCTIONS.
MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.
GARY BARBERIO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER.
I AM HERE TONIGHT TO SPEAK WITH YOU ABOUT AN ITEM RELATED TO OUR NEGOTIATIONS WITH NRG AND SDG&E AND OUR ATTEMPTS TO RELOCATE THE SDG&E SERVICE CENTER.
JUST TO QUICKLY REMIND THE COUNCIL WHAT OUR 2014 AGREEMENT SAYS.
THE IDEA WAS TO TRY AND FIND A DIFFERENT LOCATION FOR THE SDG&E OPERATIONS CENTER OFFSITE ON A SITE THAT WAS MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE TO SDG&E AND THE CITY.
AND IF WE WERE SUCCESSFUL IN DOING THAT UNDER THE AGREEMENT, THE CITY OF CARLSBAD WOULD RECEIVE TITLE TO THE OPERATIONS CENTER SITE, ALONG WITH THE CANNON PARK SITE.
AND A PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SHORE OF THE AGUA DIANA LAGOON.
SO THAT'S FROM THE 2014 POWER PLANT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY NRG AND SDG&E.
THE LAST TIME WE WERE BEFORE THE COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM WAS OCTOBER 11TH.
AND AT THAT MEETING STAFF HAD TWO RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COUNCIL.
YOU ACTED ON ONE OF THOSE AND THE SECOND ONE YOU CONTINUED PRIMARILY BECAUSE COUNCILMEMBER NORBY RECUSED HIMSELF FROM THIS CONVERSATION AND THEN MAYOR HALL WAS NOT AT THAT MEETING.
SO THE DIRECTION YOU DID GIVE US ON OCTOBER 11TH, YOU TOOK ONE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS.
YOU DIRECTED STAFF TO CONTINUE OUR DISCUSSIONS REGARDING RECONFIGURING THE OPERATIONS CENTER ONSITE AND THEN TO RETURN TO THE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 13TH WITH THE PROGRESS REPORT.
THE OTHER RECOMMENDATION WAS RELATED TO LOT 11, AND OUR RECOMMENDATION WAS IN RESPONSE TO DIRECTION YOU GAVE US ON JULY 26. AT THAT TIME, THE COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF IN LOOKING FOR A RELOCATION SITE TO EMPHASIZE LOT 11 AS A POSSIBLE RELOCATION SITE.
IN OCTOBER, WHEN WE CAME TO YOU, WE PROVIDED INFORMATION REGARDING WHAT.
IS A MUTUAL DECISION BETWEEN CITY STAFF IN OUR G AND SDG.
THAT A LOT OF 11 IS NOT A FEASIBLE SITE AS A RELOCATION SITE.
AND AGAIN, COUNCIL DID NOT TAKE ACTION ON THAT RECOMMENDATION AND DIRECTED US TO COME BACK TO YOU WHEN WE HAD A FULL COUNCIL.
AND THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AT TONIGHT.
AGAIN, I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THIS WASN'T A DECISION SOLELY OF SDGG&E.
THIS WAS A DECISION FROM ALL THREE PARTIES, THE CITY, SDG&E AND NRG.
AND WE CONCLUDED THAT LOT 11 IS NOT A FEASIBLE RELOCATION SITE.
[00:50:05]
AND I WILL SAY REPRESENTATIVES FROM NRG AND SDG&E ARE HERE TONIGHT AND WILL BE SPEAKING AND ANSWERING ANY QUESTIONS THE COUNCIL MAY HAVE.SO THE REASONS FOR THE INVISIBILITY RELATE TO THE THINGS THAT I'M COVERING ON THIS SLIDE.
BECAUSE OF THOSE AND OTHER REASONS, THERE'S GOING TO BE A VERY DIFFICULT TIME OBTAINING THE NECESSARY ENTITLEMENTS AND PERMITS THAT WOULD BE NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT AN OPERATION CENTER ON THAT SITE.
IF YOU RECALL, LOT 11 IS CURRENTLY DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE AND THAT WAS PUT IN PLACE BY PROP D, PROPOSITION D BACK IN 2006, A VOTER INITIATIVE.
AND CURRENTLY THE OPEN SPACE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONE DO NOT ALLOW FOR OPERATIONS CENTERS.
SO WE WOULD HAVE TO DO SOMETHING ENTITLEMENT WISE TO CLEAR UP THAT CHALLENGE, WHICH MAY INVOLVE ANOTHER VOTE OF THE PEOPLE TO REMOVE THE PROPERTY FROM OPEN SPACE.
AND WE ALSO DO NOT HAVE THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT RIGHTS IN THAT AREA.
SO THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, IF WE GOT THAT FAR, WOULD BE COMING FROM THE COASTAL COMMISSION.
AND THEN ON TOP OF THAT, BECAUSE IT'S A PUBLIC UTILITY, WE WOULD NEED THERE WOULD BE PROCESSING AND PERMITS THAT WOULD NEED TO COME APPLICATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION AFTER ALL THAT.
SO A VERY LENGTHY ENTITLEMENT TIME FRAME.
AND THEN THE LAST REASON RELATES TO COSTS, PRIMARILY THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, THE DIFFICULTY AND THE PERMITS AND THE TIMING ISSUES LEAD TO A MUCH HIGHER COST TO DEVELOP THAT SITE AS A SERVICE CENTER.
AND IT LEADS TO A BIG GAP BETWEEN WHAT IS THE AVAILABLE FUNDING THAT ENERGY MIGHT BE COMMITTED TO, PROVIDING AN SDG TO WHAT THE ACTUAL COST OF DEVELOPING THE OPERATION CENTER WOULD BE WITH.
I JUST REMIND YOU OF THE PROXIMITY OF LOT 11 TO THE SERVICE CENTER SITE.
A LOT OF 11 IS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CANNON ROAD, EAST OF THE FREEWAY.
BUT ALL OF THIS LAND HERE THAT SDGE IS THE OWNER OF WAS INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSITION D BACK IN 2006.
AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE SERVICE CENTER SITE HERE IN RED.
BASED ON YOUR DIRECTION IN OCTOBER, OCTOBER 11TH, WE ARE CONTINUING TO DISCUSS VARIOUS OPTIONS TO RECONFIGURE THE OPERATIONS CENTER ON SITE, RELOCATING IT EASTWARD AGAINST THE TRACKS ONTO BOTH SDG&E LAND AND NRG PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD LEAVE STILL A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF ACREAGE ON THE WESTERN PORTION OF SDGE'S PROPERTY THAT COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY SOMEWHERE IN THE AREA OF TEN PLUS ACRES. THIS IS JUST SOME GRAPHICS THAT SHOW WHAT THAT COULD LOOK LIKE.
PRIMARILY, WE'RE REALLY FOCUSING MORE ON THE YELLOW DASH LINE OPTION, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE SDGE PROPERTY AS WELL AS NRG PROPERTY IN THIS AREA, FREEING UP ALL OF THIS LAND TO THE WEST THAT COULD POTENTIALLY BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY.
SO OUR RECOMMENDATION TONIGHT IS FOR YOU TO PROVIDE US DIRECTION TO DISCONTINUE OUR EFFORTS TO INCLUDE THE LOT 11 PARCEL IN OUR NEGOTIATIONS, AND THEN STAFF WILL CONTINUE NEGOTIATIONS REGARDING OTHER ALTERNATIVES.
[00:55:03]
YET. SO IF COUNCIL'S DESIRE IS TO MAYBE DELAY THAT DECEMBER 13TH TO SOMETIME EARLY IN 2023, ALMOST SAID 24, I DIDN'T MEAN THAT IN 2023 WE WOULD TAKE THAT DIRECTION AS WELL.AND WITH THAT, I'LL CLOSE MY PRESENTATION.
AND AS I SAID, SDG&E AND NRG REPRESENTATIVES ARE HERE TONIGHT AS WELL.
THANK YOU. SO THANK YOU, MR. BARBERIO. I HAD QUITE A BIT OF CLARITY, SO THANK YOU.
THAT WAS A VERY GOOD PRESENTATION.
OUR SPEAKERS ARE FROM SDG&E AND NRG.
WOULD YOU LIKE FOR ME TO CALL THEM AT THIS TIME? SURE. THE FIRST SPEAKER IS JOE GABALDON, FOLLOWED BY BRITTANY APPLESTINE.
GOOD EVENING, HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.
I AM JOE GABALDON, SDG&E NEWS PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER FOR NORTH COAST COMMUNITIES.
WE THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE OUR PERSPECTIVE ON THIS EFFORT.
WE'RE REALLY EXCITED AND APPRECIATIVE OF YOUR DEDICATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUING TO COLLABORATE WITH YOU AND CERTAINLY WITH MAYOR HALL AND COUNCILMEMBER NORBY.
BE INVOLVED AND PARTNER ON SO MANY MORE INITIATIVES IN THE COMMUNITY.
AND OUR CUSTOMERS THAT OUR MISSION IS TO IMPROVE LIVES AND COMMUNITIES BY BUILDING AND OPERATING THE CLEANEST, SAFEST AND MOST RELIABLE ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY IN AMERICA TO SUPPORT MISSION CRITICAL OPERATIONAL NEEDS.
OUR NORTH COAST SERVICE CENTER MUST BE CENTRALLY LOCATED BETWEEN HIGHWAY 56 AND LAS PULGAS ROAD TO THE NORTH TO ENABLE US TO SERVE MULTIPLE COMMUNITIES IN NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY.
AND OF COURSE, OUR FLEET OF BUCKET TRUCKS AND ANCILLARY VEHICLES ARE MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED ONSITE.
FURTHERMORE, THE SERVICE CENTER SERVES AS A HUB FOR SDG&E NEEDS CRITICAL OPERATIONAL RESPONSE TO LOCAL EMERGENCIES SUCH AS POWER OUTAGES, CUSTOMER CONCERNS, CONSTRUCTION DIG INS THAT RUPTURE BOTH ELECTRICAL AND NATURAL GAS LINES.
I AM NOW PLEASED TO TURN IT OVER TO BRITTANY, OUR DIRECTOR OF REGIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS.
THANK YOU FOR LETTING US SPEAK THIS EVENING.
ESPECIALLY IN LIGHT OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, SDG&E'S OPERATIONAL NEEDS AND WE ALSO HAVE THESE GOALS AND THE REGULATIONS SET BY THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION.
GIVEN THE CONCERNS OF EACH PARTY, THIS CONFIGURATION SEEMS TO MEET THE GOALS FOR EACH PARTY AND WOULD POTENTIALLY OPEN UP THE PROPERTY THAT SDG&E CURRENTLY OWNS THAT FRONTS ON CARLSBAD BOULEVARD.
WHILE THIS PROCESS HAS TAKEN LONGER THAN ANY OF US WOULD HAVE LIKED, IT IS IMPORTANT TO RECOGNIZE THAT THIS RELOCATION INVOLVES A VERY COMPLEX REGULATORY TRANSACTION THAT WILL REQUIRE THE CPUC'S APPROVAL.
OUR EXPERIENCE HAS SHOWN THAT THE MORE DILIGENCE WE CAN APPLY TO THIS STUDY AND IN A DECISION AMONGST ALL THE PARTIES THAT IT'S GOING TO HELP US PREPARE A STRONG AND THOROUGH APPLICATION FOR THE COMMISSION'S REVIEW.
[01:00:01]
KEEPING TO A SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS OF EVERY TWO WEEKS, THE PARTIES ARE WORKING TO FINALIZE A PROPOSAL, AS MR. BARBERIO JUST TALKED ABOUT.WE ARE CONTINUING TO WORK ON A MUTUAL PROPOSAL.
AT OUR LAST MEETING, WE WERE ALSO ASKED TO DISCUSS WHY WE WOULD ELIMINATE PARCEL 11, AND I WANTED TO REITERATE THE KEY ISSUES THAT MR. BARBERIO ALREADY PRESENTED THE TIMING, THE COST, THE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND THE ADDITIONAL PERMITS THAT WOULD BE NEEDED TO RELOCATE TO LOT 11.
THE SITE, THEREFORE, WOULD REQUIRE COSTLY CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND MITIGATION MEASURES AND ITS MOST EXPENSIVE OF THE THREE POTENTIAL SITES THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT ON CANNON ROAD . THE PRESENCE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS INCREASES THE REGULATORY COMPLEXITY.
I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS OR I DON'T KNOW IF WE GO TO ANOTHER SPEAKER.
AND ACTUALLY, BEFORE WHILE I WAS JUST GOING TO ASK IF WE'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE OTHER PARTY, THE MISSING PARTY NRG, BEFORE WE GO TO QUESTIONS, WHAT ARE THEY? SPEAKER YES, ERIC LOUISA, THANK YOU.
I'M ERIC LOUISA. I'M WITH NRG AND I THINK WE WOULD JUST EXPRESS OUR AGREEMENT WITH STAFF AND SDG&E WITH RESPECT TO THE RECOMMENDATION TO DISCONTINUE WORK ON LOT 11.
THE PARTIES HAVE BEEN DILIGENTLY WORKING TOGETHER TO FIND A SOLUTION, BUT THE CHALLENGES WITH A LOT 11, AS EXPLAINED BY THE CITY AND SDG&E ARE VERY LARGE.
WE HAVE A LOT OF WORK LEFT TO DO, BUT THE PARTIES ARE WORKING CONSTRUCTIVELY AND COLLABORATIVELY TO EVALUATE THE REORIENTATION OF THE SERVICE CENTER AWAY FROM THE COAST AND TOWARD THE RAILROAD TRACKS.
AND WE BELIEVE THAT THOSE DISCUSSIONS SHOULD CONTINUE.
WE HAVE A MEETING TOMORROW AND ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO CONTINUING WORK WITH THE OTHER PARTIES.
THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS.
THAT CONCLUDES ALL THE SPEAKERS.
MEMBER ACOSTA. GREAT, THANK YOU.
I THINK IN GENERAL, I MAY KNOW THE ANSWERS TO SOME OF THESE, BUT I'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM YOU, MR. BARBERIO. THE TIMELINE FOR WORKING ON THE RELOCATION EVER SINCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
CAN YOU JUST GIVE US THE TIME FRAME AND THE TERMS OF THE SORRY, NOT THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT, THE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PACE OF HOW WE WORKED ON THIS RELOCATION SINCE THE BEGINNING AND HOW QUICKLY WE'RE WORKING ON IT NOW.
SO WE ENTERED INTO THE AGREEMENT IN JANUARY OF 2014 AND WE DID WORK DILIGENTLY WITH SDG&E FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS TO TRY AND FIND AN OFF SITE LOCATION.
AND THAT DID NOT PROVE VERY FRUITFUL.
AND I THINK IT WAS ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF, TWO YEARS AGO NOW.
WE CAME TO THE COUNCIL WITH THE THE SHOPS AT CARLSBAD IDEA AND WE PURSUED THAT FOR ABOUT A YEAR.
AND THAT PROVED TO NOT BE A SOLUTION.
AND I THINK IN AUGUST WE CAME TO THE COUNCIL WITH THAT POSITION THAT THE SHOPS ISN'T GOING TO WORK.
I WILL SAY THAT BOTH ENERGY AND SDG ARE HAVE MADE A HUGE COMMITMENT OF TIME PERSONNEL, CONSULTANTS AND WORKING TOWARDS THIS.
AND, YOU KNOW, WILL WE HAVE A DEAL IN THE END? I FEEL PRETTY CONFIDENT THAT WE WILL.
IT MAY NOT BE THE DEAL THAT WE ANTICIPATED IN 2014, BUT REMEMBER, WE DO HAVE THE CONSOLATION PRIZE OF $10 MILLION IF WE'RE UNABLE TO ACHIEVE ANYTHING. AND SO THE DEAL THAT WE HOPE TO BRING TO THE COUNCIL WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE CITY THAN $10 MILLION. THAT'S THE GOAL.
[01:05:08]
THE MEETINGS ARE GOING ON EVERY OTHER WEEK NOW.TO TRY TO REALLY BRING THIS TO A RESOLUTION, CORRECT? OKAY, GREAT. AND I KNOW OUR STAFF ALSO MADE A HUGE INVESTMENT IN STAFF TIME AND CONSULTANTS AS WELL TO TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN.
WHAT KINDS OF OTHER OFFSITE OPTIONS WERE CONSIDERED.
BUT WERE THERE TEN OR HOW MANY OTHER SITES IN GENERAL, ABOUT A DOZEN OTHER SITES WERE LOOKED AT WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA THAT MET SDG&E'S CRITERIA, WHICH IS GENERALLY CITY LIMIT TO CITY LIMIT LINE, AND THEN NO FURTHER EAST THAN EL CAMINO REAL.
BUT FOR VARIOUS REASONS, SIZE, DIFFICULTY, ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS COST.
THEY'VE BEEN DEVELOPED SINCE THEN.
SO IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE INTENSELY WORKING WITH OUR PARTNERS AND WE'RE MEETING EVERY OTHER WEEK.
WE'VE LOOKED AT MANY DIFFERENT OPTIONS.
SO NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT THE BACKSIDE POTENTIALLY OF THE CURRENT SITE FOR TO RELOCATE SDG&E'S FACILITIES, WHICH WOULD FREE UP, YOU SAID, I BELIEVE, TEN ACRES TOWARDS THE FRONT, THE WEST, THE WESTERN SIDE, OCEAN FACING SIDE OF THIS SITE.
IS THAT CORRECT? YES, IT WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY TEN ACRES AND WOULD BE THE WESTERN TEN ACRES OF SDG&E'S PROPERTY. AND AT THE LAST MEETING, I REMEMBER ASKING ABOUT ANY KIND OF BUFFER THAT MIGHT BE NEEDED BETWEEN THE OPERATIONS OF SDG&E AND ANY USES THAT WE MIGHT CONTEMPLATE FOR THE WESTERN SIDE.
BUT IT STILL LOOKS LIKE ABOUT TEN ACRES WOULD BE USABLE.
AND YOU DID KIND OF TALK ABOUT THE LATEST THAT YOU'VE GOT A MEETING TOMORROW.
I KNOW THAT YOU'VE HAD MEETINGS SINCE OUR LAST COUNCIL DISCUSSION.
AND YOU ALSO MENTIONED THAT YOU'RE COMING BACK TO THE COUNCIL POTENTIALLY IN DECEMBER.
WELL, CURRENTLY, DECEMBER 13, UNLESS WE CHANGE THAT.
CORRECT. WE BASED ON COUNCIL'S DIRECTION, WE'RE SCHEDULED TO COME BACK ON THE 13TH.
WE COULD CERTAINLY DO THAT AND GIVE YOU AN UPDATE, BUT ALSO WILL BE THE FIRST COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE NEWLY ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBER.
ALSO THE FIRST ONE FOR THE NEWLY REELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE MAYOR.
BUT SO IF THE COUNCIL DESIRES, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HEAR A WHOLE LOT.
YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR WE'RE MAKING PROGRESS.
WE'RE MEETING, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ALL THE DEAL IN PLACE YET.
SO IT MAY MAKE MORE SENSE TO COME TO YOU IN EARLY 2023 RATHER THAN DECEMBER 13TH.
OKAY. THANK YOU. YOUR CHOICE, THOUGH, WE'RE HAPPY TO TO DO AS COUNCIL WISHES.
THANK YOU FOR ANSWERING ALL THE QUESTIONS AND I APPRECIATE YOUR HARD WORK.
THANK YOU. AND THANKS FOR THE PRESENTATION.
JUST A FEW QUESTIONS, THEN I HAVE SOME COMMENTS.
SO WHAT IS THE FEASIBILITY OF MOVING FORWARD WITH? AND IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S A POTENTIAL FAVORED OPTION FROM WHAT'S BEING PRESENTED.
SO WHAT IS THE FEASIBILITY OF MOVING FORWARD WITH THE SERVICE CENTER SITE? IT SOUNDS LIKE THAT IS A POTENTIAL OPTION.
SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE SCRATCHED OFF THE TABLE ALL OF A SUDDEN, BECAUSE I'M SURE MANY FOLKS ARE WONDERING, YOU KNOW, LIKE WHAT'S WHERE ARE WE AT? WHERE ARE WE GOING? GIVEN THAT WE'RE ALMOST AT THE NINE YEAR MARK IN JANUARY.
SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS IN TERMS OF FEASIBILITY OF MOVING FORWARD, DO WE FEEL THAT THERE IS MORE FEASIBILITY WITH THAT PARTICULAR SITE THAN THE OTHER DOZEN SITES THAT WE'VE ALREADY SCRATCHED OFF THE TABLE? ABSENT SOME 12 TO 16 ACRE PIECE OF LAND COMING OUT OF NOWHERE IN CARLSBAD, WHICH I DON'T SEE HAPPENING AND BEING AVAILABLE.
I THINK THE RELOCATION ON SITE IS THE ONLY FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVE THAT IS LEFT.
AND I FEEL. NOW RELATIVELY CONFIDENT THAT WE CAN AT LEAST STRUCTURE A AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE THREE PARTIES, AS SDG REPRESENTATIVES SPOKE TO.
[01:10:03]
IT ISN'T JUST WITHIN OUR CONTROL.WE DO WE WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH AND MAKE AN APPLICATION TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, AND THEY WILL HAVE TO WEIGH IN AND APPROVE AS SDG&E IS A PUBLIC UTILITY.
SO THE TRANSFER OF LAND AND ANY FUNDING THAT WOULD BE NEEDED FROM SDG&E TO BUILD THE OPERATIONS CENTER AND THE SITE ITSELF. AND DOES IT SERVE THE RATEPAYERS WELL? THOSE ARE DECISIONS THAT ULTIMATELY ARE THE PUCS AND NOT THE THE THREE PARTIES OR THE CITY COUNCIL OF CARLSBAD.
SO THAT'S THE VERY CONFIDENT THAT WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE A DEAL BEFORE THE COUNCIL.
BUT THERE'S OTHER QUESTION MARKS OUT THERE STILL CHALLENGES.
OKAY. AND A COUPLE OF CLARIFYING QUESTIONS FROM THAT QUESTION AND THE ANSWER THAT YOU PROVIDED.
IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE ARE NOT OTHER OPTIONS BEING CONSIDERED.
THAT'S HELPFUL. AND THEN IN TERMS OF THE CPUC'S TIMELINE AS TO WHEN THEY LOOK AT THINGS AND WHAT THAT WHOLE PROCESS LOOKS LIKE, ARE WE LOOKING AT MONTHS, A YEAR? WHAT? JUST SO AGAIN, WE CAN KIND OF PUT AT LEAST SOME SORT OF A TIME FRAME IN MIND FOR PEOPLE AS TO WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE? YES. AND I MAY ASK SDG&E TO CLEAN UP ANY MESS I LEAVE WITH THIS ANSWER.
ONCE WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE THREE PARTIES, IT WILL BE ABOUT A YEAR TO PREPARE AND MAKE AN APPLICATION TO THE PUC AND ABOUT A YEAR AT LEAST IN PROCESSING TO A DECISION AT THE PUC.
SO IF WE WERE SUCCESSFUL IN ACHIEVING AN AGREEMENT, LET'S SAY IN THE FIRST QUARTER IN 2023, IT WOULD BE TWO YEARS AFTER THAT BEFORE WE WOULD KNOW THE ANSWER FROM THE PUC.
SO WE'RE LOOKING AT EARLIEST 2025? CORRECT.
YES. AND WE'RE LOOKING AT THE COST ESTIMATES FOR THIS CONSTRUCTION BASED ON THAT KIND OF SCHEDULE.
SO THAT'S PART OF THE CONVERSATION AND THE COST ESTIMATING WE'RE WORKING WITH RIGHT NOW, TOO.
IT SOUNDS LIKE FOR OUR DECEMBER MEETING THAT YOU'LL LIKELY HAVE MORE OF AN UPDATE.
IT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE WE'LL HAVE WHAT YOU WERE SAYING.
A PACKAGE WITH A BOW READY FOR US IN DECEMBER JUST YET.
OKAY. CAN CAN YOU GIVE US ALL SOME FRAME OF REFERENCE AS TO WHEN WE COULD EXPECT THAT? BECAUSE I KNOW AND I KNOW WE WERE ALL TRYING.
I, I THINK FOR US AS REPRESENTATIVES TO THE PEOPLE, WE REALLY WANT TO GET TO THAT RESOLUTION.
SO FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE, JUST CURIOUS IF WE CAN HEAR FROM ALL PARTIES, IF WE CAN AT LEAST COMMIT TO THE FIRST QUARTER, BECAUSE I DO THINK THAT FROM THAT ONWARDS, THEN THAT STARTS THAT TWO YEAR TIMELINE THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IN TERMS OF THAT PLAN THAT YOU ALL HAVE TO WORK OUT, THEN, YOU KNOW, PROVIDE AND THEN THEY HAVE TO PROCESS. SO AGAIN, THAT TWO YEAR TICKING MARK STARTS WHENEVER WE ACTUALLY CAN GET TO THAT RESOLUTION.
IT'S KIND OF THAT WHEN DO WE THROW IN THE TOWEL AND, YOU KNOW, ACCEPT THE 10 MILLION, GIVE UP THAT THERE'S ANY ALTERNATIVE? WE STILL FEEL CONFIDENT THAT WE CAN REACH AN AGREEMENT AND PROBABLY A MORE APPROPRIATE TIMEFRAME THAN DECEMBER 13, MIGHT BE IN FEBRUARY TO COME BACK TO THE COUNCIL WITH STATUS AND HOPEFULLY THE DEAL BY THEN AS WELL.
WOW. A VALENTINE'S TIMES DAY GIFT.
I JUST HAVE COMMENTS. THANK YOU.
JUST A QUICK COMMENT AND I HAVE A COMMENT AND A QUESTION ALSO.
BUT GO AHEAD. JUST A QUICK COMMENT JUST TO ASK SDG&E.
WE THINK IT'S TAKEN A LONG TIME.
WE'RE NOT GETTING WHAT WE HOPE TO GET.
BUT WITH THAT SAID, I THINK IT'S ALSO FAIR FOR ME TO SAY WHEN POWER GOES OUT, MINUTES SEEM LIKE HOURS, BUT I'VE BEEN VERY IMPRESSED WITH HOW QUICKLY YOUR STAFF GETS OUT THERE WITH THE PROPER EQUIPMENT AND GETS THESE INTERRUPTIONS RESOLVED REMARKABLY FAST.
CONSIDERING THE AMOUNT OF ACREAGE OR SQUARE MILES YOU HAVE TO COVER.
[01:15:03]
SO FOR THAT, THANK YOU.JUST THINKING NEXT STEPS IN THIS.
IN ORDER FOR THIS PROJECT TO HAVE REAL VIABILITY, WE NEED TO TRY AND USE THE YELLOW FRAMEWORK.
AND I UNDERSTAND THESE PROJECTS TAKE A LONG PERIOD OF TIME.
AND I MEAN, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE IS STILL A LONG, LONG RANGE PLAN.
AND THIS IS JUST STEP ONE OF THAT PLAN.
SO I APPRECIATE, AGAIN, THE DETAIL YOU WENT INTO.
I MEAN, THAT COULD LITERALLY ADD YEARS TO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO.
SO. SO WITH THAT, MR. BLACKMER. OH, I'M SORRY.
I TRIED TO RESERVE MY COMMENTS AND JUST FOCUS ON QUESTIONS EARLIER, SO I JUST WANTED TO SHARE MY COMMENTS AT THIS TIME AND AND ALSO SAY THAT I APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS THAT WERE MADE BY THE OTHER PARTIES, BY SDG&E AND NRG.
AND BOTH SPEAKERS USE THE WORD DILIGENCE THAT THEY ARE WORKING DILIGENTLY, THOROUGHLY AND WITH FREQUENCY OFTEN TO TRY TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS.
SO I APPRECIATE THE WORK OF OF THOSE OTHER PARTIES IN MY QUESTIONS.
I WAS TRYING TO GET AT THE IDEA THAT IT HASN'T ALWAYS BEEN LIKE THIS.
I THINK TOWARDS THE EARLIER PART OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PERIOD, WE FORGOT OR DIDN'T WORK VERY FREQUENTLY TOGETHER AND WE ARE NOW AND THIS COUNCIL AND I THINK THE NEXT COUNCIL, BECAUSE MOST OF US ARE THE SAME, WILL WILL ALSO HAVE THIS DESIRE TO CONTINUE WORKING AND GET THIS RESOLVED FOR THE COMMUNITY.
THAT'S A NO GO. IT'S GOT TO BE THE YELLOW LINES.
IN ORDER FOR US TO HAVE USABLE LAND, HAVE THE INGRESS AND EGRESS.
OTHERWISE, I THINK WE TALKED ABOUT LAST TIME.
SO ANYWAY, THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK, MR. BARBERIO AS WELL, AND ALL THE STAFF, THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AS WELL.
THANKS. AND I WOULD LIKE JUST, YOU KNOW, STAFF IS ASKING FOR A CONTINUANCE OF TIME.
I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THE FIRST MEETING IN MARCH.
AND UNLESS THEY COME TO US QUICKER WHERE THEY CAN SAY, HEY, WE CAN BEAT THE DEADLINE, BUT THAT SHOULD GIVE THEM MORE THAN AMPLE TIME TO GET IT DONE WITHOUT ANY EXCUSES. SO UNLESS SOMEBODY ELSE HAS.
I WOULD RATHER HAVE A DEADLINE MYSELF.
OKAY. WHAT'S THE DATE? I WAS GOING TO SAY THE STAFF WAS SAYING MARCH 7TH, AND PERHAPS THEY CAN DO IT SOONER.
BUT MARCH 7TH IS WHAT? I'LL ADD THAT TO MY MOTION.
AND I TOO HAD RESERVED MY COMMENTS FOR NOW.
I KNOW THAT WE'RE UP HERE, WE'RE PUTTING YOUR FEET TO THE FIRE.
AND I THINK AS REPRESENTATIVES, THAT'S OUR JOB TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE GETTING THERE.
SO WE REALLY APPRECIATE YOU ALL DILIGENTLY WORKING TOWARDS THIS.
WE DO LOOK FORWARD TO HOPEFULLY IN THAT FIRST QUARTER HAVING THAT RESOLUTION.
I THINK FOR MYSELF, YOU KNOW, I WAS HOPING IT WAS GOING TO BE DECEMBER THAT WE WOULD HAVE THAT.
AND I'M HEARING FROM EVERYONE THAT WE ARE ALMOST THERE.
SO I THINK HAVING THAT TIME CERTAIN DEFINITELY TO BE ABLE TO SAY THIS IS WHEN WE WILL HAVE THAT RESOLUTION, WHETHER IT'S MARCH 7TH OR IF YOU CAN DO IT SOONER, BELIEVE ME, WE WILL BE VERY HAPPY.
BUT I REALLY WANT TO JUST EMPHASIZE THAT WE'RE GOING INTO THE NINTH YEAR POST SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
[01:20:05]
SO REALLY APPRECIATE EVERYONE'S WORK BEING DONE ON THAT.THANKS. MR. BLACKBURN. SORRY, MR. BLACKBURN, WHEN YOU MAKE YOUR MOTION, IF YOU COULD SAY WHEN YOU SAY MARCH 7TH OR SOONER.
WELL DONE. SO MOVING ON TO ITEM 14, LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN.
[14. LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN]
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER. YOU WANT TO MAKE THE.THANK YOU, MAYOR. I'D LIKE TO INVITE THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER, JOHN KIM FOR THE PRESENTATION.
THANK YOU AGAIN. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR.
JOHN KIM, CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER.
ALSO WITH ME IS ANDREW PRESCOTT FROM CR ASSOCIATES.
STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE CITY OF CARLSBAD LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN, THE LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN, OR OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE LRSP, IS A DATA DRIVEN TRAFFIC SAFETY PLAN.
IN 2019, CALTRANS ANNOUNCED THAT AGENCIES NEED TO HAVE AN LRSP IN PLACE IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR FUTURE HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM GRANTS.
SO IN 2020, WE RECEIVED A $72,000 GRANT FROM CALTRANS AND BROUGHT ABOARD SEE OUR ASSOCIATES TO HELP PREPARE THE LRSP.
WHAT IS AN LRSP? IT IS A DATA DRIVEN ANALYSIS.
IT PROVIDES THE FRAMEWORK TO IDENTIFY, ANALYZE AND PRIORITIZE ROADWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO REDUCE FATALITIES AND SERIOUS INJURIES ON OUR ROADWAY NETWORK.
THE DRAFT LRSP WAS PRESENTED TO THE TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION.
THE CARLSBAD LRSP LOOKED AT DATA FROM 2015 TO 2019, INCLUDING COLLISION STATISTICS FOR VEHICLES, BICYCLES AND PEDESTRIANS. IT EXCLUDED DATA FROM 2020 DUE TO ANOMALIES IN TRAFFIC AND TRAVEL PATTERNS CAUSED BY THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC AND TRAVEL SHUTDOWN.
LOOKING AT COLLISION STATISTICS FOR VEHICLES, BIKES AND PEDESTRIANS.
THE LRSP EFFORT ALSO SAW INPUT FROM A VARIETY OF STAKEHOLDERS, INCLUDING OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS, LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS, NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT AND TRANSPORTATION ADVOCACY GROUPS.
THE LRSP IDENTIFIED AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENHANCEMENTS BASED ON COLLISION DATA.
SOME IMPORTANT FACTORS FOR PEDESTRIANS INCLUDE DRIVERS FAILING TO YIELD TO PEDESTRIANS WITHIN CROSSWALKS AND PEDESTRIANS FAILING TO YIELD TO DRIVERS OUTSIDE OF CROSSWALKS.
UNSAFE SPEED AND AN INCREASE IN E-BIKE USAGE.
IMPORTANT FACTORS FOR VEHICLES INCLUDE UNSAFE SPEED.
FAILURE TO STOP AT A LIMIT LINE.
SAFETY IMPROVEMENT. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT INCLUDE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM, BICYCLE EDUCATION COURSES, TARGETED ENFORCEMENT AND TRACKING E-BIKE COLLISIONS.
[01:25:08]
HERE'S AN EXAMPLE OF SOME OF THE ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS, INCLUDING RECTANGULAR, RAPID FLASHING BEACONS FOR CROSSWALKS, HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK MARKINGS, REFLECTIVE BACK PLATES ON TRAFFIC SIGNAL INDICATIONS, GREEN PAINT AND BIKE LANE CONFLICT AREAS, RED LIGHT INDICATORS TO ASSIST THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN TICKETING RED LIGHT VIOLATIONS AND AN ALL RED PEDESTRIAN PHASE AT TRAFFIC SIGNALS.THE DECLARATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY WAS ENACTED AFTER THE LRSP WAS SCOPED AND DEVELOPED.
TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE IDENTIFIED AS PART OF THE EMERGENCY RESPONSE WERE BASED ON MORE RECENT BIKE COLLISIONS FROM 2019 TO 2022, BUT ARE IN LINE WITH THE MITIGATION STRATEGY IDENTIFIED IN THE LRSP.
THESE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE GREEN BIKE LANE ENHANCEMENTS AND CONFLICT AREAS, DEPLOYMENT OF SPEED FEEDBACK SIGNS AND ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARDS AND HIGH BIKE COLLISION AREAS, ENHANCING SIGNAL OPERATIONS TO PRIORITIZE THE PEDESTRIAN PHASE AND THE RESTRIPING OF TARGETED STREETS SUCH AS EAST WEST CORRIDORS.
THAT CONCLUDES STAFF PRESENTATION.
I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ALONG WITH ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS THAT MR. PRESCOTT WOULD BE ABLE TO ANSWER.
SPEAKERS. THERE ARE NO SPEAKERS MAYOR.
QUESTIONS. DON'T SEEM TO BE RAISING THEIR HAND.
THEN DO WE NEED A MOTION ON THIS? ADOPT RESOLUTION, ITEM 14, APPROVE ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION, CONTAIN AN AGENDA, ITEM NUMBER 14.
WELL DONE. THERE'S A LOT OF DATA IN HERE, TOO.
[15. ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL UPDATE FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2022-23]
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER.YOU WANT TO MAKE THE INTRODUCTIONS? THANK YOU, MAYOR. I'D LIKE TO INVITE FINANCE DIRECTOR ZACH KORACH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER MATT SANFORD.
THANK YOU, JEFF. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
MY NAME IS MATT SANFORD. I'M THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER FOR THE CITY.
THIS EVENING WE WILL BE PROVIDING..
ADDITIONALLY, COSTS ARE RISING.
INFLATION CONTINUES TO BE A PROBLEM.
IN SAN DIEGO, PRICES ARE UP 8.2% YEAR OVER YEAR.
AND THEY HAVE SIGNALED A COMMITMENT TO CONTINUE RATE HIKES UNTIL INFLATION IS CURBED.
NATIONALLY, OCTOBER JOBS DEMAND EXCEEDED EXPECTATIONS.
MANY BUSINESSES HAVE HAD CHALLENGES RETAINING WORKERS AS THEY PURSUE OTHER JOBS WITH BETTER WAGES.
WE HAVE NOTED THAT RETAILERS ARE PROJECTING LOWER SEASONAL HIRING FOR THE HOLIDAYS.
[01:30:03]
NATIONALLY, REAL GDP INCREASED AT AN ANNUAL RATE OF 2.6% IN THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2022, WHICH IS A GOOD SIGN IN CONTRAST TO A DECREASE OF 0.6% IN THE SECOND QUARTER.OUR ECONOMY GREW BY APPROXIMATELY $1 BILLION BETWEEN 2020 AND 2021.
HERE IN CARLSBAD, THERE WERE 15,217 UNIQUE JOB POSTINGS BETWEEN JULY AND SEPTEMBER.
OF JOBS POSTED, 66% INDICATED A NEEDED EDUCATION OF HIGH SCHOOL OR GED OR LESS.
THIS HAS LIMITED SOME INDUSTRIES GROWTH.
RETAIL VACANCY RATES ARE IMPROVING BUT HAVE NOT YET CAUGHT UP TO PRE-PANDEMIC LEVELS.
OFFICE SPACE IS CURRENTLY AT AN AVERAGE OF $38.06, AND THAT'S CLIMBED THE PAST FOUR QUARTERS.
THIS VALUE IS SEASONALLY ADJUSTED AND ONLY INCLUDES THE MIDDLE PRICE TIER OF HOMES.
CARLSBAD HOME VALUES HAVE RISEN 18% ON AVERAGE OVER THE PAST YEAR.
HOWEVER, 2022 SUMMER PEAK LAGGED 2019 LEVELS SLIGHTLY.
OCCUPANCY DID CATCH UP IN SEPTEMBER AND WAS 2% HIGHER THAN THE SAME MONTH IN 2019.
THE IMPACTS OF INFLATION AND A POTENTIAL RECESSION COULD HAMPER TOURISM GLOBALLY, BUT CARLSBAD IS WELL POSITIONED AS A DESTINATION THAT COULD SEE STRONG TOURISM EVEN THROUGH A RECESSION. BASELINE COMPARISON, OF COURSE, IS 2019 AS IT REPRESENTS NORMAL CONDITIONS.
ADR WAS $303.68 IN JULY, $264.30 IN AUGUST, AND $220.87 IN SEPTEMBER.
THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 2308 BUSINESS LICENSES ISSUED LAST QUARTER, INCLUDING 1019 NON RESIDENTIAL, 559 RESIDENTIAL AND 730 OUTSIDE THE CITY LICENSES.
THAT'S AN INCREASE OF 239 OVER THE SAME QUARTER OF 2021.
BETWEEN JULY AND SEPTEMBER, PERMIT ACTIVITY INCREASED FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS AT 1220 AND REPRESENT THE REPRESENTED THE LARGEST NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL PERMITS IN THE PAST THREE YEARS.
COMMERCIAL PERMITS ISSUED WERE AT 99, DOWN SLIGHTLY FROM THE LAST QUARTER.
A RECESSION MAY BE LOOMING, BUT OUR CARLSBAD ECONOMY REMAINS IN A STRONG POSITION.
AND NOW I'LL TURN IT OVER TO THE CITY'S FINANCE DIRECTOR, ZACH KORACH.
GOOD EVENING, MAYOR. MAYOR PRO TEM, COUNCIL MEMBERS.
I'M ZACK KORACH, FINANCE DIRECTOR, AND WE WILL JUMP RIGHT INTO THE GENERAL FUND REVENUES.
[01:35:04]
AGAIN, WE'RE LOOKING AT THE FIRST THREE MONTHS OF THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR TO PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT OF CONTEXT AS TO WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT.THE FIRST ORANGE COLUMN REPRESENTS THE FIRST THREE MONTHS OF ACTUAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES LAST YEAR.
THE SECOND GREEN COLUMN REPRESENTS WHAT WE EXPECTED TO RECEIVE IN THE FIRST THREE MONTHS THIS YEAR.
AND AGAIN, WE'RE GOING TO BE FOCUSING ON THIS PARTICULAR SLIDE ON THE FIRST THREE CATEGORIES.
STARTING FIRST WITH PROPERTY TAX.
WE SAW A DOWNWARD TREND OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS IN AIRCRAFT TAXES, AND THAT HAS SINCE PICKED UP.
SALES TAX REVENUES HAVE INCREASED BY $700,000 OR 5%.
AND I WANT TO TAKE A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME TO TALK ABOUT SALES TAX.
NOT ONLY IS IT THE SECOND LARGEST GENERAL FUND REVENUE SOURCE, BUT IT IS ALSO HIGHLY SENSITIVE TO ECONOMIC TRENDS INDICATORS AND ALSO HAS A LOT OF INHERENT VOLATILITY THAT COMES WITH IT.
DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FISCAL YEAR 22-23 ADOPTED BUDGET.
THE CITY HAD APPLIED VERY CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES WITH ITS SALES TAX.
WHAT WE ACTUALLY EXPERIENCED IN THE FIRST THREE MONTHS IS QUITE DIFFERENT.
WE HAD INITIALLY ANTICIPATED A REDUCTION DUE TO LINGERING SIGNIFICANTLY HIGH INFLATION LEVELS.
AND WHAT WE SAW DURING THE FIRST THREE MONTHS IS THAT RISING AND SUSTAINED LEVELS OF INFLATION ACTUALLY SERVED AS A BOOST FOR SALES TAX REVENUES, WHERE WE HAD INITIALLY THOUGHT THAT FOLKS AS PURCHASING POWER WOULD BE REDUCED.
WE THINK THAT SAVINGS THROUGHOUT THE PANDEMIC HAD SERVED AS A BIT OF A BUFFER TO BACKFILL THE INCREASED PENT UP DEMAND THAT LINGERED THROUGH THE FIRST THREE MONTHS OF THE FISCAL YEAR. THAT SAID, WHILE THIS IS VERY GOOD NEWS, FOR THE FIRST THREE MONTHS, THE LEVEL OF UNCERTAINTY CONTINUES TO GROW.
AS WE MOVE FORWARD, LEVELS OF INFLATION CONTINUE TO SUSTAIN IT AT HIGH LEVELS.
SO WE ARE CERTAINLY TAKING A CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC APPROACH.
NEXT IS TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX, $1.6 MILLION INCREASE OR 16%.
IN TOTAL WITHIN THE GENERAL FUND.
NOW, FLIPPING TO THE OTHER SIDE OF THE LEDGER, THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET.
WHAT COMPRISES THAT $25 MILLION? TWO MAIN THINGS.
FIRST IS CARRY FORWARD ENCUMBRANCES, ANY OUTSTANDING PURCHASE ORDERS OR COMMITMENTS TO SPEND AS OF JUNE 30 OF LAST YEAR ARE CARRIED FORWARD INTO THE THE SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEAR.
ALSO CARRY FORWARD APPROPRIATIONS.
ANY UNSPENT BUDGET IS SUBMITTED FOR BOTH THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR RESPECTIVE REVIEW AND APPROVAL AND IS ULTIMATELY CARRIED FORWARD TO THE SUBSEQUENT YEAR. SO AS OF SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2022, THERE'S AN AVAILABLE BUDGET REMAINING OF $144 MILLION OR 63%.
[01:40:04]
SO HERE WE'RE LOOKING AT GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES.THE SECOND GREEN COLUMN REPRESENTS THE FIRST QUARTER OF ACTUALS LAST YEAR, AND THE THIRD AND FINAL BLUE COLUMN REPRESENTS THE FIRST QUARTERS OF ACTUAL EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES.
AS WE CAN SEE, WE ARE TRENDING RELATIVELY CONSISTENT YEAR OVER YEAR WHEN WE LOOK AT PERSONNEL.
IT IS NATURAL TO SEE A SLIGHT INCREASE VIA NEGOTIATED SALARY INCREASES AND THEN FIXED INCREASES RELATED TO CALPERS RETIREMENT COSTS AND HEALTH RATE INCREASES.
HERE WE HAVE THE SAME INFORMATION, BUT THIS TIME PRESENTED NUMERICALLY.
AGAIN, LOOKING AT THE PRIMARY DIFFERENCE ON THIS SLIDE IS WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE PERCENT OF BUDGET THAT IS SPENT THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE EXPENSE OR THE OUTSTANDING PURCHASE ORDERS OR ENCUMBRANCES.
THIS PROVIDES A LITTLE BIT MORE OF A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF HOW WE'RE TRACKING YEAR OVER YEAR.
THAT'S PREDOMINANTLY WITHIN PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS.
NOW MOVING OVER TO SOME OF THE CITY'S ENTERPRISE FUNDS WATER AND WASTEWATER.
THE INCREASE IN WATER REVENUES IS LARGELY DRIVEN BY AN INCREASE IN WATER RATES.
THAT'S SLIGHTLY OFFSET WITH THE DECREASE IN WATER VOLUME SALES.
AS FOR WASTEWATER REVENUES, THEY ARE UP 19 THREE, 19.3%, LARGELY DRIVEN BY RATE INCREASES, AND EXPENSES ARE UP 2.4%, MAINLY DRIVEN BY PERSONNEL COSTS.
LOOKING AT THE GOLF COURSES ENTERPRISE FUND, IT IS STILL CONTINUING TO PERFORM VERY STRONGLY.
SINCE THE ONSET OF THE PANDEMIC, DEMAND FOR GOLF AND OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES HAS FLOURISHED AND WE'RE STILL SEEING THOSE TRENDS CONTINUE EVEN AS WE WORK OUR WAY OUT OF THE PANDEMIC. NET INCOME THROUGH THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE FISCAL YEAR IS $60,000 HIGHER THAN LAST YEAR, WHICH IS A VERY POSITIVE SIGN CONSIDERING THE GOLF COURSE BROUGHT IN A RECORD AMOUNT OF REVENUE DURING FISCAL YEAR 21-22.
NOW, AS FOR THE NEXT STEPS, OF COURSE, STAFF WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES.
AND WE WILL NEXT BE BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL IN FEBRUARY OF 2023 TO PRESENT THE MID-YEAR UPDATE.
AND WITH THAT, THAT WILL CONCLUDE OUR PRESENTATION.
WE'D BE HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.
VERY WELL DONE. VERY WELL DONE.
THEN WE'LL GO RIGHT TO MR. NORBY. I APOLOGIZE FOR JUMPING THE GUN.
AND IT'S A QUESTION THIS IS REALLY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PUBLIC, I THINK.
BUT BUT THEY'RE NOT EQUAL IN TERMS OF WHAT COMES INTO CARLSBAD.
AND SO COULD YOU GO OVER, FOR EXAMPLE, ON PROPERTY TAX WHEN WE PAY PROPERTY TAX, HOW MUCH OF THAT STAYS IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND HOW MUCH OF THAT GOES TO THE COUNTY OR OTHER ENTITIES AND THEN DO THE SAME FOR SALES TAX? SO WE PAY SALES TAX.
DOES IT ALL STAY IN THE CITY OR DOES SOME OF IT GO UP TO SACRAMENTO? AND THEN THE SAME FOR TOT TAX? COULD YOU PLEASE GO OVER THAT? ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION.
AS FAR AS PROPERTY TAX IS CONCERNED.
SO A RESIDENT'S PROPERTY TAX BILL WILL GENERALLY BE ABOUT ONE 1.1% OF THAT.
THE CITY WOULD BE ENTITLED TO BE RECEIVING APPROXIMATELY 11% OF THAT AMOUNT.
SO WHILE ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, THE CITY WILL GENERALLY GENERATE ABOUT $78 MILLION IN PROPERTY TAX REVENUES, THAT STILL SERVES TO BE A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE GENERAL FUNDS REVENUES.
IT IS THE HIGHEST REVENUE SOURCE FOR SALES TAX.
[01:45:04]
A APPROXIMATELY 7.75% IS ASSESSED AS THE TAX ON GOODS, AND OF THAT THE CITY OF CARLSBAD WOULD RECEIVE 1%.OF THAT WITH THE COUNTY AND OTHER REGIONAL JURISDICTIONS OR ENTITIES RECEIVING.
OKAY. SO THAT'S, I GUESS WHAT, 13%, 14 ONE OF THIS.
TRANSIENT OCCUPANTS AND TOT TANKS.
THANK YOU, FOR TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX.
THAT WOULD BE THE ONE TAX WHERE IT IS 100% LOCALIZED.
SO FOR IT'S A 1 TO 1 FOR EVERY TOT TAX DOLLAR THAT IS REMITTED FROM AN OCCUPANT TO THE HOTELIER THAT IS REMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE CITY.
SO FAIR TO SAY THAT CARLSBAD KEEPS 100% OF THAT TOT TAX.
CORRECT. SO I GUESS THE POINT THAT I'M DRIVING AT AS WE GROW INDUSTRIES HERE, IF WE WANT A ASSUMING THAT PROPERTY TAX REVENUE GROWS, SALES TAX REVENUE GROW AND TOT GROWS EQUALLY, THE BENEFIT TO CARLSBAD IS EIGHT OR TEN TIMES AS GREAT WITH TOT BECAUSE WE SIMPLY KEEP IT ALL AND THE REST IS A PERCENTAGE, YOU KNOW, 11% OR 14%.
AND HERE AND SO IT IS I HOPE IT STAYS THAT WAY FOR A LONG TIME.
AND THEN I'M NOTING THAT IT IS REAL CLOSE TO IT'S SECOND LARGEST SOURCE OF INCOME.
IS THAT RIGHT, BASED ON THIS CHART? I'M SORRY. TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY.
YES, THAT WOULD BE NUMBER THREE.
AND SO AS WE AND, YOU KNOW, I GUESS HISTORICALLY, THE GROWTH OF RETAIL SALES IN TERMS OF PERCENTAGES VERSUS THE GROWTH OF TOT OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST TEN YEARS, HAVE THEY BEEN TRACKING THE SAME OR HAS TOT OUTPACED SALES TAX SIMPLY BECAUSE ROOM RATES ARE GOING UP AND I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PROVIDE A DEFINITIVE ANSWER.
BUT I WILL SAY ON MY RECOLLECTION, LOOKING AT THE HISTORY OF TOT AND SALES TAX, THEY HAVE INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY OVER THE LAST TEN YEARS, AND THERE ARE INHERENT CORRELATIONS BETWEEN THE TWO REVENUE CATEGORIES.
A LOT OF THEM ARE TIED TO ECONOMIC TRENDS IN TERMS OF SENSITIVITY, BUT IN TERMS OF WHETHER ONE PARTICULAR INDUSTRY GROUP OF SALES TAX, SUCH AS GENERAL RETAIL, WAS GROWING AT THE SAME RATE OF TOTT, I'D HAVE TO CONFIRM THAT.
THEY'RE NOT MAKING ANY MORE ROOM RATES GO UP.
BUT IT WOULD BE GREAT TO SEE THAT TO HELP US FORECAST MAYBE YOU KNOW THAT PARTICULAR, YOU KNOW, CHART, IF YOU WILL, IN TERMS OF WHAT HAS THE HISTORIC RIGHTS BEEN ON BOTH OF THOSE? SURE. OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER ACOSTA.
LOOKS LIKE MY MIC WAS ALREADY ON.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE PRESENTATION AND I REALLY LIKE ESPECIALLY THIS SLIDE.
I KNOW WHEN YOU GIVE OTHER PRESENTATIONS, YOU ALSO SHOW A PIE CHART AND YOU SHOW SOME OTHER FIGURES.
BUT FOR THIS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PRESENTATION TODAY, SEEING THE FIGURES FROM FIRST QUARTER OF THIS YEAR HAVE IT'S VERY ENLIGHTENING BUT ALSO PLEASING TO SEE HOW WELL WE'VE DONE IN COMPARISON WITH OUR BUDGETS.
ONE OF THE TERMS THAT YOU USED EARLIER, MR. KORACH, WAS CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC AND YOU ALSO TALKED ABOUT BUDGETING CONSERVATIVELY.
AND I THINK THAT THOSE ARE REALLY KEY TO NOT BEING SURPRISED BY A DOWNTURN AND BY THE INCREASE IN INFLATION THAT WE SEE HAPPENING NOW. I KNOW THAT OUR STAFF IS MONITORING THE ECONOMIC TRENDS AND WE'RE TRYING TO STAY ON TOP OF IT.
WE SEE THOSE PROJECTIONS IN OTHER PRESENTATIONS LOOKING FIVE, TEN YEARS OUT.
AND WE ARE TRYING TO BE VERY CAREFUL.
SO THE ONLY ONE THAT I HAD A REAL QUESTION ON WAS THE THE GOLF COURSE THAT'S DOING SO AMAZING OUR CROSSINGS AND JUST KIND OF WONDERING ABOUT THE REPAYMENT OF THE MONEY THAT THE CITY HAD LENT TO THEM.
IS THAT HOW IS THAT PAYMENT PLAN GOING? SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE COMMENTS AND QUESTION.
SO APPROXIMATELY $55 MILLION WAS WRITTEN OFF ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF OR TWO YEARS AGO.
[01:50:08]
COURSE, MEMBERS FROM JK MANAGEMENT.WE ARE STILL CURRENTLY WORKING ON THE DRAFT DOCUMENT, BUT PUTTING TOGETHER A POLICY RESERVE POLICY, SO TO SPEAK, THAT WILL PROVIDE A GUIDELINE AS TO HOW SURPLUS AND RESERVES WITHIN THE GOLF COURSE FUND ARE TO BE USED.
THE ULTIMATE INTENT IS TO ENSURE THAT THE GOLF COURSE AS A FUND ITSELF AND AS AN OPERATION DOES NOT NEED TO RELY ON THE GENERAL FUND FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.
AGAIN, SECOND AND FOREMOST OR SECONDLY I'LL SAY IS CAPITAL NEEDS.
AND SO BUILDING UP THAT CAPITAL RESERVE, SIMILAR TO WHAT THE GENERAL FUND DOES ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, TAKING 6% OF ESTIMATED REVENUES AND MOVING IT OVER TO FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS, WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO SET SOMETHING UP VERY SIMILAR TO THAT IN THE GOLF COURSE FUND FOR ITS RESPECTIVE CAPITAL NEEDS AND THEN ANY SURPLUS REMAINING THEREAFTER UP TO A CERTAIN, I'LL SAY, THRESHOLD OR CAPACITY COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR REPAYMENT BACK TO THE GENERAL FUND.
SO IT'S KIND OF A ROUGH OUTLINE OF WHAT WE ARE STARTING TO PUT INTO THE WORKS.
WE'RE HOPING THAT THIS MIGHT BE A YEAR END MECHANISM OR WE CAN REALLY SEE THE FINAL RESULTS OF THE GOLF COURSE FINANCIALLY AND MAKE THE MOST ACCURATE RECOMMENDATION TO BEGIN CONSIDERING THOSE REPAYMENTS.
GREAT. THANK YOU. THAT'S MORE THAN I HAD HEARD BEFORE.
SO I'M VERY GLAD TO HEAR THAT.
IS THERE A TIMELINE ON PUTTING TOGETHER THIS STRUCTURE THAT YOU OUTLINED? IT COULD BE AS SOON AS MEETINGS, BEGINNING WITH THE FISCAL YEAR 23-24 PROPOSED AND ADOPTED BUDGET OR PERHAPS JUST SHORTLY AFTER FISCAL YEAR END.
THAT COULD ALSO BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE A MORE EXPANDED REPORT, INCLUDING INFORMATION ON THE GOLF COURSE TO MAKE THOSE TYPES OF RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD THEY APPLY GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF SURPLUS OR RESERVE THAT EXISTS AT THAT TIME.
GREAT, GREAT. YEAH, I DEFINITELY HEARD IN THE PRESENTATION RECORD HIGHS, HISTORIC HIGHS.
AND I HEARD YOU SAY JUST NOW $55 MILLION NOT WRITTEN OFF.
I DO REMEMBER WHEN THE COUNCIL HAD TO VOTE FOR FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING REPORTING PURPOSES THAT AMOUNT WAS NOT WRITTEN OFF, BUT WE HAD TO DECLARE THAT IT WAS KIND OF AN INDEFINITE PAYMENT REPAYMENT PERIOD.
NOBODY LIKES TO SEE SOMEBODY WHO OWES THE MONEY KIND OF DO GREAT, BUT NOT EVER REPAY YOU.
SO IT'D BE GREAT TO SEE THAT HAPPEN.
THAT WAS THE BIG THING THAT I HAD A QUESTION ABOUT.
OTHER THAN THAT, I'M SO PLEASED WITH EVERYTHING THAT YOU'VE PRESENTED HERE TONIGHT.
THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION.
IT SOUNDS LIKE OUR GRP WENT UP BY $1 BILLION THIS PAST YEAR.
WAS THAT ACCURATE? THAT WAS BETWEEN 2020 AND 2021, YES.
BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE, YOU KNOW, YOU MENTIONED THAT THE AVERAGE INCOME FOR SOME OF THOSE SERVICE LEVEL JOBS IS $45,700. WAS THAT DID I GET THAT RIGHT? THE ADVERTISED WAGE FOR THOSE POSITIONS ON AVERAGE.
YES. OKAY. AND I MEAN, THERE'S QUITE A FEW FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
BUT I JUST I'M ALSO CURIOUS AND YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE THIS I JUST WANTED TO ASK, HOW MUCH ON AVERAGE ARE FOLKS SPENDING ON RENT FOR LIKE A STUDIO, ONE BEDROOM OR TWO BEDROOM IN THE CITY? DO WE HAVE THAT AT ALL? NO, I DON'T BELIEVE WE HAVE THAT.
BUT WE CAN LOOK, I BELIEVE, TO COUNTYWIDE AVERAGES AND GET BACK TO YOU.
THE ONLY REASON WHY I WANTED TO EMPHASIZE THAT IS BECAUSE, OF COURSE, THAT AVERAGE I UNDERSTAND WHY BUSINESSES CAN PAY THAT MUCH FOR THAT SKILL LEVEL.
BUT AT THE SAME TIME, RENT IS ASTRONOMICALLY HIGH.
AND SO, OF COURSE, FOLKS ARE TRAVELING FROM DIFFERENT PLACES.
AND THEN GIVEN THE FACTORS OF GAS PRICES AND DIFFERENT TRENDS IN TERMS OF THE INDUSTRY SHIFTING FROM BEING IN PERSON TO REMOTE AND ALL THESE OTHER THINGS, WHICH I KNOW YOU ALL ARE VERY MUCH AWARE OF, BUT I'M JUST STATING OUT LOUD IS WHY I THINK WE'RE SEEING THAT SHIFT IN TERMS OF FOLKS NOT WANTING TO TAKE ON THAT
[01:55:05]
JOB. THE OTHER THING THAT I KNOW WE'VE TALKED ABOUT DURING THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND THAT I JUST WANTED TO BRING UP HERE WAS WITH REGARDS TO LIKE HOW WE'RE WORKING WITH THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY TO ATTRACT SOME MORE OF THAT TALENT OR TRAIN FOLKS IN THAT PARTICULAR REGARD.AND I KNOW I HAD ASKED I KNOW WE HAVE THAT FOR LIKE MANUFACTURING AND OTHER JOBS.
SO I WAS JUST CURIOUS IF I KNOW THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I WAS JUST CURIOUS ON.
AS IS, IS THERE SOMETHING THAT THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY IS WORKING ON WITH REGARDS TO WORKING WITH THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND TRYING TO FILL THAT PIPELINE? I WOULD SAY THROUGH EDUCATIONAL PARTNERS THERE ARE NON-DEGREE TRACKS.
AS YOU HAD ALLUDED TO, THE CITY'S JOB READINESS PROGRAM, WHICH WE ARE PILOTING WITH SEVERAL PARTNERS, LOOKS TO PROVIDE THAT BASIC INTRODUCTION TO INDUSTRIES THAT ARE HIRING AT NO COST VIA A COMPLETELY ONLINE PROGRAM AND A MICRO CREDENTIAL.
IT'S A NOTABLY TIGHT LABOR MARKET AND SO HAVING THE ATTENTION OF BUSINESSES IS EASY NOW, AS IF THE LABOR MARKET BECOMES LESS CONSTRAINED. WE MAY NOT HAVE THE ATTENTION OF BUSINESSES, SO WE'RE HOPING TO CAPTURE THIS WINDOW WHERE BUSINESSES ARE AT THE TABLE AND WILLING TO PURSUE ALTERNATE MEANS TO BRING PEOPLE INTO INDUSTRY AND MAKE THOSE PROGRAMS SUSTAINABLE.
GREAT. AND I THINK ONE LAST QUESTION.
BUT I WAS JUST REALLY GLAD TO SEE, YOU KNOW, OUR CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES AND GLAD TO SEE WHERE WE'RE AT IN TERMS OF HOPEFULLY TRENDING IN A POSITIVE DIRECTION AND HOPING THAT IT CONTINUES.
BUT I APPRECIATE US CONTINUING TO BE AS CONSERVATIVE AS POSSIBLE AS WE MOVE FORWARD.
SO REALLY APPRECIATE THE PRESENTATION.
THANK YOU. MR. BLACKBURN, WHAT QUARTERS DO WE GET OUR PROPERTY TAXES? THE REASON I ASK THAT IS SOMEBODY LOOKING AT THIS WOULD SAY THIS JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
IT'S BECAUSE WE GET OUR PROPERTY TAXES AT DIFFERENT QUARTERS.
WHEN WHEN IS THAT? SO WE GENERALLY RECEIVE THOSE THOSE ALLOCATIONS IN NOVEMBER, DECEMBER AND THEN LATER IN THE SPRING, IN THE MONTH OF APRIL.
I SHOULD HAVE CLARIFIED THAT WHEN LOOKING AT THESE NUMBERS AND SAYING THAT PROPERTY TAX IS THE LEADING REVENUE SOURCE, IT CERTAINLY DOESN'T LOOK LOOK LIKE IT BASED ON THESE FIGURES. BUT YEAR OVER YEAR, WHEN STAFF PRESENT THE FIRST QUARTER, THE NUMBERS DO LOOK VERY CONSISTENT WITH THESE AS THEY'RE PRESENTED.
WHEN YOU SEE THE MID-YEAR UPDATE, IT'LL BE SUBSTANTIALLY LARGER.
RIGHT. THERE ARE MULTIPLE, I'LL SAY, CHANNELS OF ALLOCATION FROM THE PROPERTY TAX AS A AS A GREATER REVENUE SOURCE BETWEEN SECURED UNSECURED.
THERE'S SUPPLEMENTAL THERE'S AIRCRAFT TAXES.
THE PRIMARY ALLOCATIONS FOR SECURED AND UNSECURED WOULD BE RECEIVED.
AND THOSE THOSE TWO ALLOCATIONS IN NOVEMBER, DECEMBER AND APRIL.
WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT AIRCRAFT TAXES, ARE AIRCRAFTS TAXED LIKE IT'S SOMEBODY'S HOUSE.
IF THEY PAY $1,000,000 FOR AN AIRPLANE, IT'S TAXED AT THE 1.1 1.3%.
SINCE YOU PROBABLY DON'T HAVE THIS FIGURE, BUT IT'D BE INTERESTING TO HAVE, SINCE WE PAID OFF THE GOLF COURSE, WHAT'S BEEN THE POSITIVE REVENUE OVER THAT PERIOD OF TIME? DO YOU KNOW THAT? SO. SINCE THE SINCE WE PAID OFF THE BOND.
AND I DON'T EXPECT YOU TO HAVE IT, BUT IT'D BE A NICE NUMBER BECAUSE IT IS A POSITIVE NUMBER.
IT'S NOT A NEGATIVE NUMBER, CORRECT? RIGHT. IN TERMS OF NET INCOME THAT WAS GENERATED AT THE GOLF COURSE.
OKAY. HELP ME UNDERSTAND THIS.
IN INFLATION, WHO WINS? WHO'S THE FIRST TO WIN? IS THAT NOT GOVERNMENT? DURING PERIODS OF INFLATION.
[02:00:01]
WHEN THE PRICE OF GAS DOUBLES, SO DOES THE TAX.WHO GETS THE BENEFIT OF THE TAX? WELL, I WILL SAY FOR.
THIS ISN'T TO YOUR POINT, BUT USING GAS AS AN EXAMPLE.
IT'S REALLY NOT THE PRICE OF GAS THAT HAS IMPACTS ON ON TAX REVENUES.
BUT TO YOUR POINT, THE PURCHASE OF GOODS, CERTAINLY THE GOVERNMENT WOULD WOULD BENEFIT, RIGHT? I MEAN, WE'RE SEEING THAT FROM A SALES TAX PERSPECTIVE WHERE WE ARE BENEFITING DURING THE FIRST THREE QUARTERS BECAUSE INFLATION HAS INCREASED THE PRICES AND DEMAND HAS NOT YET ADJUSTED.
IT'S NOT TO SAY THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE IN A LESS ADVANTAGEOUS POSITION.
SO RIGHT NOW WE'RE WINNING, CORRECT.
PRICE OF HOMES OVER THE LAST TWO OR THREE YEARS.
HOW MUCH HAS IT BEEN INFLATED? 20%, 30% RIGHT ABOUT THERE.
SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THESE NUMBERS, ALL THESE NUMBERS ARE SKYROCKETING AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME.
SO LET'S GO BACK TO 08090 TEN AFTER IT GOES THE OTHER DIRECTION.
HOW DOES THAT AFFECT GOVERNMENT? IT'S USUALLY THE LAST PERSON TO GO DOWN, BUT THEY'RE DOWN THE LONGEST.
IS THAT NOT CORRECT? TRUE. OKAY.
SO RIGHT NOW WHAT WE'RE SEEING IS BEING VERY POSITIVE NUMBERS IS DUE TO INFLATION.
AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN WHEN THINGS STARTED TO GO DOWN, I.E.
PROPERTY WENT DOWN 20, 30% AT LEAST.
I MEAN, THAT COULD BE HOW OUR NUMBERS TREND OVER THE NEXT 3 TO 5 YEARS.
SO EVEN THOUGH YOU'RE VERY POSITIVE TODAY AND YOU'RE SEEING THE BEGINNING OF INFLATION AS YOU WORK YOUR WAY THROUGH IT, IT GOES INTO THE REVERSE. AND SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE PEOPLE AWARE OF THAT.
YOU CAN SAY WE'RE DOING REALLY WELL NOW.
TO ME, THAT'S, OH MY GOD, HOW BAD IS IT GOING TO HURT? SO THOSE ARE JUST SOME OF MY COMMENTS ON AS WE'RE AS WE'RE HERE TODAY.
SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? MR. BLACKBURN, JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
DID I UNDERSTAND WHEN YOU SAID WE PAY TAXES BASED ON THE GALLON OF GAS, NOT ON THE PRICE OF GAS? IS THERE ALSO A SALES TAX ON A GALLON OF GAS THAT'S BASED ON THE PRICE OF THE GAS? CORRECT. I BELIEVE IT IS A MORE MINIMAL AMOUNT.
BUT WHEN WE REFER TO GAS TAX, ONE OF THE CITY'S FUNDING SOURCES FOR MAINTAINING STREETS AND ROADS, THAT GAS TAX THAT ULTIMATELY GETS REMITTED TO THE STATE AND THEN DISTRIBUTED TO JURISDICTIONS THAT IS ASSESSED BASED ON VOLUME OR THE GALLONS THAT IS PURCHASED RATHER THAN THE PRICE.
SO THERE'S NOT A SEVEN AND THREE QUARTERS PERCENT SALES TAX ON A GALLON OF GAS.
I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S THE ENTIRE 7.75.
IT'S SEVEN. AND SO WHEN GAS GOES UP THAT YOU SAID, I THINK, WHAT 1% OF THAT OR ONE OF THE PERCENTAGE OF THAT SEVEN THREE QUARTERS COMES BACK TO THE CITY, IF IT IS ASSESSED ON THE SALE OF GASOLINE, THEN YES, THAT WOULD ABSOLUTELY BE CORRECT.
JUST AN ADDITIONAL COMMENT SINCE WE HAVE AN EARLY NIGHT AND THIS IS THE LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA, I THINK IT'S SOME CONTEXT IN TERMS OF INFLATION AND WHO WINS AND GOVERNMENT. YOU KNOW, CLEARLY I THINK ON OUR BUDGETS, THERE'S NO DOUBT WE'RE GOING TO RECEIVE WHEN WE HAVE THAT THERE IS SOME PROTECTION WHEN THE ECONOMY GOES DOWN.
BUT IT'S TO DESCRIBE IT AS KIND OF A WIN FOR GOVERNMENT OR GOVERNMENT AND FIRST PLACE.
I THINK IT'S WRONG BECAUSE WE ALSO HAVE SEVERAL HUNDRED MILLION SOCKED AWAY FOR PROJECTS AND THAT ARE INVESTED AND WE HAVE OUR 60% RESERVE THAT WE HAVE AND WE'RE LOSERS THERE, RIGHT? SO THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION GOES UP.
THAT MONEY IS WORTH A LOT LESS EVERY YEAR WHEN WE HAVE INFLATION.
BUT OVERALL I THINK IT HARMS US.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION.
THANK YOU. AND JUST A QUICK COMMENT, MR. NORBY. IF YOU TRACK UP AND DOWN AN ECONOMY, I WOULD JUST USE THE ALGA NORTE POOLS AND EXAMPLE.
[02:05:02]
IT WAS A $50 MILLION POOL.SO IT'S HOW YOU TRACK THE ECONOMY AND WHEN YOU CHOOSE TO MAKE YOUR BIG EXPENDITURES.
SO WHEN YOU'RE MAKING EXPENDITURES THAT ARE 50 OR $100 MILLION IF YOU'RE WATCHING THE ECONOMY.
OBVIOUSLY, THERE'S TIMES TO BUILD AND THERE'S TIMES NOT TO BUILD.
BUT THEN ALL WE HAD TO DO IS RECEIVE THE REPORT CORRECTLY.
GOT IT. COUNCIL MEMBER ACOSTA.
WE DID HAVE OUR LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEETING ON MONDAY.
I'M SORRY. I THOUGHT IT WAS COMMENTS ON THAT PRESENTATION.
I DO HAVE COMMENTS THAT ARE THE NEXT ITEM.
[COUNCIL COMMENTARY AND REQUESTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS]
SORRY FOR INTERRUPTING YOU.THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE HAD ITS BOARD RETREAT LAST WEEK.
I WASN'T ABLE TO STAY THE ENTIRE TIME LAST YEAR, BUT THIS TIME I WAS.
LEARNING ABOUT THE WORK TO TO EMPOWER OUR LOCAL BUSINESSES THAT THE CHAMBER DOES.
I DON'T SIT ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, BUT AS A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER AND SOMEBODY WHO REALLY CARES ABOUT SUPPORTING OUR LOCAL BUSINESS COMMUNITY, I DEFINITELY COULD SEE THAT WE AS A CITY ARE DOING A LOT TO SUPPORT OUR BUSINESSES.
SO I LOVE THAT, THAT SENSE OF GREAT TEAMWORK.
I MENTIONED LAST WEEK THAT IT'S STREAMED ONLINE SO ANYBODY CAN LOOK AT THEIR WEBSITE.
I ALSO HAVE THE CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE BOARD MEETING ON THURSDAY THAT'S ALSO STREAMED ONLINE IF YOU JUST GO TO THEIR WEBSITE SO ANYBODY CAN WATCH AND PARTICIPATE THAT WAY. THERE ARE INSTRUCTIONS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE WEBSITE AS WELL.
DR. BHAT-PATEL. YES, THANK YOU.
SO JUST WANTED TO REPORT OUT ON THE LEAGUE OF CITIES.
WE WILL BE TALKING ABOUT, YOU KNOW, JUST WHAT OUR PRIORITIES ARE GOING TO BE MOVING INTO THE YEAR.
I WILL BE MEETING WITH OUR STAFF AND ALSO WITH SOME OF OUR OTHER LEADERS TO DISCUSS WHAT WE'LL BE DOING AS A REGION TO ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF OUR CITIES AT THE STATE LEVEL. AND THEN ALSO WE DID ACTUALLY HAVE A PRESENTATION FROM AN ORGANIZATION FROM SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY THAT FOCUSES SPECIFICALLY ON HELPING. CITIES WITH REGARDS TO SOLUTIONS, SPECIFICALLY AROUND ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES.
AND THEN OUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE MET YESTERDAY AND WE HAD A GREAT PRESENTATION ON JUST SOME WAYS THAT WE CAN INCORPORATE AND LOOK FORWARD INTO THE FUTURE WITH REGARDS TO TECHNOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ETC.
I DO HAVE AN NCTD BOARD MEETING AND A COMMITTEE MEETING FOR NCTD SPECIFICALLY ON THURSDAY.
I'LL PUT ANOTHER PLUG IN FOR EVERYONE THAT CAME.
IT'S ALWAYS REALLY FUN IN THE VILLAGE WHEN WE HAVE THAT.
SO ENJOY THANKSGIVING AND THE REST OF NOVEMBER.
AND AGAIN, I JUST WANT TO BEGIN BY CONGRATULATING YOU AND DR.
WE DO NOT HAVE ANY AREAS WHERE I THINK THERE WILL BE THREE OF US OVER THE NEXT.
SO I HAVE NOTHING TO REPORT THERE.
I HAVE NO OTHER REPORTS MYSELF, ONLY TO SAY MANAGER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM.
[CITY MANAGER COMMENTS]
THANK YOU. ONLY TO SAY HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL AND OF COURSE, TO THE STAFF AND THE PUBLIC AS WELL.THANK YOU. I ECHO THOSE SENTIMENTS.
NOTHING, THANK YOU. AND AGAIN, I WISH EVERYONE IN THE COMMUNITY A HAPPY THANKSGIVING AND BE SAFE.
[02:10:04]
WITH THAT, WE STAND ADJOURNED.