[00:00:03]
WELCOME TO THE CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION OF JULY 2ND, 2025.
[CALL TO ORDER]
ROLL CALL. CLERK, PLEASE.. HAVE IT BE NOTED THERE ARE FOUR MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION HERE WITH US THIS EVENING.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. COMMISSIONER BURROWS, WOULD YOU DO US THE THE HONOR? READY? BEGIN.
. OKAY, NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE MINUTES OF THE
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
JUNE 18TH MEETING. GIVEN THAT WE HAVE OUR MEMBERS HERE THIS EVENING, WE DO NOT HAVE A MAJORITY THAT WE'RE HERE AT THE MEETING OF JUNE 18TH.SO THEREFORE, WE WILL GO AHEAD AND CONTINUE THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES TO OUR NEXT MEETING.
SECOND MEETING OF JULY. MINUTES CLERK, DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER SLIPS AT ALL FOR THE PUBLIC? NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT. THERE ARE NO SPEAKER SLIPS THERE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. IN REGARD TO ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA. THE BROWN ACT ALLOWS ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC TO COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA.
ALL OTHER NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE HEARD AT THE END OF THE MEETING.
IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE BROWN ACT, NO ACT CAN OCCUR ON THESE ITEMS. MR. CLERK, DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER SLIPS? NO, CHAIR.
WE DO NOT. THANK YOU. I'LL DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION TO THE SCREEN IN REGARD TO THE HEARING PROCEDURES. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE OPENED.
THE APPLICANTS WILL MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION RESPOND TO CLARIFYING QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS.
THEY WILL HAVE TEN MINUTES FOR THEIR PRESENTATION.
AFTER ALL, THOSE WANTING TO SPEAK HAVE DONE SO.
THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY PERIOD WILL BE CLOSED. THE APPLICANT WILL.
APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO ISSUES OR QUESTIONS RAISED.
THE COMMISSIONERS WILL THEN DISCUSS THE ITEM AND THEN VOTE ON THAT.
YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THESE PROCEDURES IN THE BACK OF TONIGHT'S AGENDA.
NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM NUMBER ONE.
[1. COASTLINE CHURCH AMEND 2025-0001 (DEV02116)]
I'M NOW GOING TO OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM NUMBER ONE.FIRST, COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY EX-PARTE THAT YOU WISH TO SHARE? I DROVE BY THE SITE. OKAY. COMMISSIONER FOSTER.
I'VE DRIVEN BY THE SITE, COMMISSIONER AND I DROVE BY THE SITE AS WELL.
MR. LARDY, WOULD YOU PLEASE PRESENT THE ITEM? YES. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. BEFORE I TURN IT OVER TO SENIOR PLANNER KYLE VAN LEEUWEN, I JUST WANT TO COMMENT FOR THE RECORD THAT THERE ARE FOUR COMMISSIONERS HERE, BECAUSE THIS IS A LAND USE ACTION THAT REQUIRES A RESOLUTION.
PER OUR CUSTOM AND PRACTICE, WE HAVE ADVISED THE APPLICANT THAT THERE ARE FOUR MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE TONIGHT, AND THEY HAVE ELECTED NOT TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE.
THANK YOU, CITY PLANNER, AND GOOD EVENING PLANNING COMMISSION.
YES. TONIGHT'S ITEM IS THE COASTLINE CHURCH REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
[00:05:02]
THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT 2215 CALLE BARCELONA.IT IS A SITE THAT'S JUST UNDER SIX AND A HALF ACRES IN SIZE.
IT CONSTITUTES THE VILLAGE J OF THE ARROYO LA COSTA MASTER PLAN.
THE SITE IS ACCESSED FROM CALLE BARCELONA AND IT IS NOT WITHIN THE COASTAL ZONE.
IN TERMS OF LITTLE PROJECT HISTORY. THE MASTER PLAN, WHICH WAS APPROVED IN THE 70S AND 80S DESIGNATED THIS SPECIFIC SITE WITHIN THE MASTER PLAN FOR CHURCH USE. IN 2004 THERE WAS A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR A CHURCH CAMPUS, AND IN 2012 AND 2016, SOME MINOR AMENDMENTS WERE APPROVED TO THAT MASTER TO THAT SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, MAINLY CONNECTED TO THE USE OF MODULAR BUILDINGS ON THE SITE.
AND THEN IN 2019, A LARGER AMENDMENT WAS REQUESTED BY THE CHURCH AND THIS AMENDMENT WAS APPROVED, AND THIS ALLOWED FOR A NEW MINISTRY CENTER TO BE BUILT AS PART OF A PHASE ONE ADDITIONAL EXPANSION AND SOME OTHER ADDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND A PARKING LOT EXPANSION AS PHASE TWO AND PHASE ONE HAS BEEN COMPLETED OF THAT 2019 AMENDMENT.
THE CURRENT PROJECT IS A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE REMAINING DEVELOPMENT PHASE.
THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE PARKING LOT TO OCCUR AFTER THE BUILDING ADDITIONS, AND NOT AT THE SAME TIME. THE APPLICANT HAS INCLUDED THE USE OF OFFSITE PARKING TO MEET THE NEEDS AS PART OF THE PROPOSAL FOR THE ADDITIONAL PARKING NEEDS, AND IS OF NOTE THAT NO PHYSICAL CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT IS REQUESTED WITH THIS AMENDMENT.
SO HERE'S A CURRENT LOOK AT THE CHURCH CAMPUS.
THE MAIN WORSHIP CENTER AND CAFE MEET UP AREA IS IN THE UPPER RIGHT THERE.
WITH THE YOUTH WORSHIP CENTER TO THE LEFT THERE.
PROPERTY ACTUALLY OWNED BY THE SAN DIEGO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT.
THE MINISTRY CENTER IS TO BE PRIMARILY USED FOR SUNDAY SCHOOL AND YOUTH ACTIVITIES BY PEOPLE WHO DON'T DRIVE AND THEREFORE DO NOT SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING. HOWEVER, THE CHURCH ANTICIPATES THAT THE NEED TO OCCASIONALLY UTILIZE ONE OF THE MINISTRY CENTERS ASSEMBLY SPACES AS OVERFLOW ROOM TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE SERVICES WITH HIGH ATTENDANCE, MAINLY RELIGIOUS HOLIDAYS SUCH AS CHRISTMAS AND EASTER.
SO THOSE ARE INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL CALCULATION.
THE DIFFERENCE IS SHOWN IN BOLD, WHERE ASSEMBLY SPACE FOR YOUTH ACTIVITIES REQUIRES FOUR SPACES, BUT THE SAME ASSEMBLY SPACE WITH ADULTS REQUIRES 40 SPACES, AND THE TOTAL PARKING REQUIREMENT AGAIN DOES INCLUDE THE 40 PARKING SPACE SCENARIO FOR THOSE OVERFLOW DAYS. SO ON A TYPICAL SUNDAY, THE CHURCH WOULD HAVE ADEQUATE PARKING ON SITE EVEN PRIOR TO THE EXPANSION OF THE PARKING LOT EVEN ONCE THE WORSHIP CENTER IS EXPANDED AND IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE USE OF THE OFFSITE PARKING LOTS WOULD LIKELY NOT BE NEEDED MOST SUNDAYS WHEN THE EXISTING 189 ONSITE PARKING SPACES CAN ACCOMMODATE THE CHURCH'S TYPICAL ATTENDANCE.
IN TERMS OF CEQA, STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT WERE ADEQUATELY ANALYZED BY THE ROYAL ACOSTA MASTER PLAN, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND MITIGATION, MITIGATION, MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM.
AND STAFF FINDS NO CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE EXIST FOR THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT AS REQUESTED, AND IT IS STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND THAT'S BASED ON FINDINGS IN THE RESOLUTION AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. THANK YOU, MR..
APPRECIATE. MR. CLERK, DO WE HAVE ANY LETTERS THAT WE HAD RECEIVED ON THIS ITEM? NO, WE DO NOT. OKAY. WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION AND IF THAT'S THE CASE, PLEASE GIVE US YOUR NAME AND YOU HAVE TEN MINUTES FOR YOUR PRESENTATION, SIR.
OKAY. MY NAME IS EDWARD WHITE, AND I APPRECIATE ALL THE WORK THAT KYLE HAS DONE.
[00:10:04]
AND I WAS ALSO PRESIDENT OF THE COSTA YOUTH ORGANIZATION.THAT'S A THAT'S MOTIVATIONAL FOR US. AND A LOT OF IT IS DUE TO OUR SENIOR PASTOR AARON JANE, WHO'S HERE WITH ME. HE CAME ON BOARD 15 YEARS AGO, AND WE'VE REALLY SEEN A LOT OF GROWTH IN PROGRESS.
HAPPENS TO BE HIS 50TH BIRTHDAY TODAY, TOO. SO SPECIAL DAY FOR HIM.
BUT WE WOULD. YEAH, WE WOULD JUST LIKE TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, TOO, BECAUSE IT'S A WIN WIN, AS WE CAN MORE SMOOTHLY BUILD OUT THE WORSHIP CENTER WITHOUT HAVING TO TACKLE THE PARKING AT THE SAME TIME.
WE ALSO CAN PROVIDE, DURING THE LIFE OF THE LEASE, OVER $100,000 TO EL CAMINO CREEK ELEMENTARY, AND MY WIFE WAS A TEACHER AND MY KIDS WENT TO EL CAMINO CREEK.
SO I SAW HER SPEND MONEY OUT OF HER OWN POCKET TO BUY SUPPLIES FOR KIDS.
SO I KNOW THE MORE WE CAN HELP THEM. IT'S A WIN WIN SITUATION.
SO WE THINK IT'S IT'S A REALLY GOOD PROPOSAL THAT WE HAVE.
SO THANK YOU, KYLE. AND I THINK AARON WANTS TO MAKE A FEW COMMENTS.
THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO TO MAKE OUR COMMUNITY BEAUTIFUL.
IT'S BEEN A DREAM LIVING HERE FOR THE LAST 15 YEARS AND BEING ABLE TO BE A PART OF THIS COMMUNITY.
AND OUR HEART IS JUST TO BE A PARTNER OF THE COMMUNITY. WE DON'T WANT TO BE A NUISANCE. WE WANT TO FIT INTO THE COMMUNITY AS WELL AS WE CAN TO SERVE THE COMMUNITY, TO PARTNER WITH THE COMMUNITY. I HAD THE PRIVILEGE THIS YEAR TO GO ON THE CALFIRE PEER SUPPORT TEAM, AND SO I'VE BEEN CALLED OUT A NUMBER OF TIMES FROM PRETTY DIFFICULT SITUATIONS WHERE HOSTING CAL FIRE TRAININGS IN OUR FACILITY AND ANYTHING WE CAN TO JUST SERVE THAT COMMUNITY WELL AND BE A BLESSING TO THE COMMUNITY.
APPRECIATE YOU. COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS YOU WISH TO ASK THE APPLICANTS? OKAY. I'LL GO AHEAD AT THIS TIME THEN. AND OPEN PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
MINUTES CLERK. DO WE HAVE ANY SLIPS? NO, CHAIR.
WE DO NOT. OKAY. IN THAT CASE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
STAFF, DO YOU HAVE ANY ANY STATEMENTS OR COMMENTS YOU WISH TO MAKE IN REGARD TO THE APPLICANT'S STATEMENTS THIS EVENING? NOTHING TO ADD AT THIS TIME. OKAY. COMMISSIONERS.
QUESTIONS OF STAFF. WELL, I HAD A QUESTION BEFORE ABOUT SECURING THE PARKING LEASES, AND MR. LARDY CLARIFIED THAT THAT'S CONDITION 15 AND WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING RIGHT HERE.
CORRECT? YES, THAT IS CORRECT. AND IT'S ON THE SCREEN.
SO, IN SHORT, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO SECURE THE LEASES AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE TO US, AND THAT WILL BE A CONDITION, SOMETHING WE CHECK PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS.
YES, COMMISSIONER. YES. SO IF I HEARD YOU RIGHT, MR. VAN LEEUWEN. [INAUDIBLE] KYLE. BUT LET'S GO. THEY DON'T EVEN NEED THE PARKING.
EXCEPT FOR THE FOR THE SPECIAL OCCASIONS, RIGHT? DID I GET THAT RIGHT? SO, YEAH, THAT INFORMATION THAT I WAS SHARING ABOUT THE PARKING WAS PART OF THE DISCUSSION AND STAFF REPORT.
SO ESSENTIALLY, YES, EVEN AT BUILD OUT, THEY WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE MORE.
AND WHEN THEY HAD LIKE A HOLIDAY, WOULD PEOPLE JUST WALK TO THE CHURCH THEN? I BELIEVE THE PROPOSAL IS TO HAVE A SHUTTLE THAT WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO GO FROM THOSE GUYS. OKAY.
ALL RIGHT. THANKS. ONE OF THE APPLICANTS, IF YOU COME UP TO THE PODIUM REAL QUICK.
I HAVE A QUESTION. AND STATE YOUR NAME AGAIN.
EDWARD WHITE. OKAY. AND, EDWARD, MR. WHITE, WOULD YOU SHARE WITH US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE I GUESS, GOALS OF THE CHURCH IN REGARD TO THE DEFERRING OF THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND THE NECESSITY FOR DOING SO, AND WHAT YOU ANTICIPATE AS TO I GUESS YOU COULD SAY THE AGREEMENTS THAT YOU MIGHT POSSIBLY HAVE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS AND THE PARKING.
SURE. EXPAND ON THAT A LITTLE BIT FOR US. YEAH. SO, I MEAN, WE'RE DOING A CAPITAL CAMPAIGN CALLED REACH MORE, AND WE TOOK ON SOME DEBT WHEN WE BUILT THE NEW MINISTRY CENTER IN 2019.
WE ARE ON TRACK TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT. THE PARKING WOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL 2.5 MILLION.
AND SO OUR GOAL IS TO DEFER THAT. WE KNOW ONCE WE DOUBLE THE SIZE OF THE WORSHIP CENTER, YOU KNOW, WE'RE GOING TO GROW AND WE'LL BE ABLE TO TACKLE THE PARKING, YOU KNOW, MAYBE FIVE YEARS DOWN THE LINE.
SO THAT'S OUR GOAL IS TO DO THIS IN A MORE ORDERLY FASHION.
[00:15:02]
AND IT WILL ALSO BE A MUCH MORE SMOOTHER CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.WE HAVE USED EL CAMINO CREEK SCHOOL AND THE THE SPORTS PARK PARKING FOR OVERFLOW IN THE PAST, EITHER WITH THE SHUTTLE OR FROM EL CAMINO CREEK YOU CAN ACTUALLY WALK.
I MEAN, THEY SEE IT AS A PARTNERSHIP. ESPECIALLY EL CAMINO CREEK.
IT'S THAT LAND IS THAT PARKING IS JUST SITTING DORMANT ON A SUNDAY.
SO THEY WOULD GET SOME EXTRA INCOME FROM THAT.
AND SO I THINK THE OVERALL GOAL, AS WE EXPAND AND DOUBLE THE SIZE OF OUR WORSHIP CENTER, IS TO DO IT IN A LITTLE MORE ORDERLY FASHION IN A WAY THAT WE CAN DIGEST IT FINANCIALLY WITHOUT HAVING TO TAKE ON ANY MORE DEBT. AND I THINK YOU HAD A SECOND PART TO YOUR QUESTION.
YES. AND THE SECOND PART IS IN REGARD TO THE THE AGREEMENTS THAT YOU WILL HAVE.
AND I GUESS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS I HAVE IS THAT IF YOU HAVE WHEN DO YOU ACTUALLY PLAN ON HAVING THOSE SHUTTLES AVAILABLE? IS IT ONLY ON CERTAIN DAYS OF THE WEEK? IS IT ONLY ON THE SUNDAYS? WILL THAT BE AN AUTOMATIC? BECAUSE YOU MIGHT HAVE LIMITED PARKING ON SITE.
HOW WOULD THAT HOW WOULD THAT. I GUESS YOU COULD SAY.
LOOK. YEAH, WHAT WE'RE PLANNING ON DOING IS WE COULD WAIT UNTIL THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENS TO START THE LEASE, BUT WE WANT TO START IT WITH EL CAMINO CREEK SOONER.
IS $1,000 A MONTH, AND, YOU KNOW, IT'S HELPING THEM.
WE CAN GET THIS ESTABLISHED. WE ALREADY HAVE THE LEASE. THEY'RE JUST WAITING FOR US TO SIGN IT.
I MEAN, SOME OF THIS IS FORECASTING, RIGHT? WE'RE NOT SURE EXACTLY.
HOPEFULLY WE NEED IT SOONER THAN WE THINK. YOU KNOW, BECAUSE WE WANT TO GROW.
BUT WE WANT TO BE PREPARED FOR THAT GROWTH WHEN WE HAVE IT.
WHERE THE SPORTS PARK IS CARVED OUT A NUMBER OF SPOTS RESERVED FOR US.
BUT THAT'S A LITTLE BIT COMPLEX TO MANAGE. SO WE WANT EL CAMINO CREEK.
AND THEN FROM THERE WE DON'T NEED A SHUTTLE EITHER. IT'S JUST A FIVE MINUTE WALK ACROSS, YOU KNOW, CALLE BARCELONA AND THEN UP TO OUR CAMPUS. SO THANK YOU.
APPRECIATE ANY OTHER FURTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION.
LIKE I MENTIONED THAT THE PARKING WAS MY MAJOR QUESTION, BUT SINCE IT'S IN THE THE CONDITIONS THAT WE WENT THROUGH A SECOND AGO, I SUPPORT THE PROJECT. COMMISSIONER FOSTER. GREAT JOB KYLE, AS ALWAYS.
SO I SUPPORT THE PROJECT AND HAPPY 50TH BIRTHDAY.
IT'S A BIG MILESTONE. SO, COMMISSIONER HUBINGER, YES, I SEE EVERYTHING IN ORDER.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON BEHALF OF THE COMMISSIONERS? OKAY. AT THIS POINT IN TIME, THEN I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND ASK THAT WE DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITIES OF A MOTION, BUT I WANT TO CLARIFY IN REGARD TO A MOTION.
ONE THING THAT I THINK WE SHOULD DO THIS EVENING IS IN REGARD TO THE COMMENTS MADE BY COMMISSIONER, I MEAN, EXCUSE ME, BY STAFF MEMBER KYLE, IS THAT THE CONSISTENT WITH THE PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT, I THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE SPECIFIED IN YOUR MOTION THAT YOUR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT IS BEEN PROPERLY APPROVED.
AND THEN, SECOND OF ALL, I WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU AS THE RECOMMENDED ACTION THAT THE STAFF REPORT MAKES MENTION OF, THAT YOU CLARIFY EACH AND EVERY WORD IN THAT VERSUS JUST SAYING PER STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
SO I OR ANY OF YOU AT THIS POINT PREPARED TO MAKE ANY MOTION? ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? COULD YOU PUT UP ON THE SCREEN THE ACTUAL MOTION SO WE COULD DO THIS? SORRY, KYLE, I KNOW I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO EXECUTE THIS WITHOUT HELP.
WELL, THIS ONE'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT IN THAT WE'RE NOT DEALING WITH AN EXEMPTION FOR CEQA.
SO THAT'S WHY I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE DO IT THIS WAY.
YEAH, I'D SAY AS AS HE BRINGS THAT UP, IT WOULD BE IN YOUR PACKAGE ON PAGE SEVEN OF 30.
ONE OF THE FINDINGS IS FINDING B, WHICH IS THE COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA.
STATEMENT FOR THE EIR, WHICH IS ON THE SECOND PAGE OF THE RESOLUTION.
[00:20:02]
THIS IS A PROCESS THAT IS ALLOWED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA AIR QUALITY ACT, TEARING OFF OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS.IF IT'S UNAFFECTED BY THE CHANGES TO THE EXEMPTION PROCESS.
THIS WAS ALWAYS SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE APPROVED AND CONSIDERED BY THE FINAL DECISION MAKER.
SO WOULD IT WOULD IT BE FAIR TO SAY THAT UNDERSTANDING THIS PROJECT HAS ALREADY HAD PRIOR SEQUA APPROVAL AS A LEAD IN? YEAH. I MEAN, IT'S UP TO THE PREROGATIVE OF THE CHAIR, BUT I'D SAY THE MAKER OF THE MOTION COULD ESSENTIALLY READ THAT STATEMENT BE AS WELL AS THE TITLE OF THE RESOLUTION. TO MAKE IT CLEAR FOR THE RECORD.
OKAY. COMMISSIONER HUBINGER, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE THE INDIVIDUAL THAT WANTS TO.
NOT YET. NOT SO QUICK HERE. I KNOW I'M A GUEST TONIGHT, BUT I DO THINK YOU COULD MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT SIMPLER. I THINK YOU COULD.
THANK YOU. I THINK YOU CAN MOVE TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION IN EXHIBIT ONE OF YOUR STAFF REPORT, INCLUDING THE FINDING ON PAGE SEVEN, FINDING B ON PAGE SEVEN, INDICATING THAT THIS PROJECT CURRENTLY COMPLIES WITH CEQA BASED ON PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. THANK YOU. CITY ATTORNEY. SO HOW WOULD YOU.
SO. ADOPT AMENDMENT 2025-001. SO I WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU AND AFTER I STATE THIS, YOU CAN JUST PARROT IT IF YOU'D LIKE, OR JUST SAY AS, AS RECITED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.
BUT YOU CAN SAY THAT YOU MOVE ADOPTION OF THE RESOLUTION IN EXHIBIT ONE, INCLUDING THE FINDING ON PAGE SEVEN, FINDING B ON PAGE SEVEN, WHICH INDICATES THAT THIS PROJECT COMPLIES WITH CEQA BASED ON PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. AND IF YOU AGREE WITH THAT MOTION, YOU CAN JUST SAY, AS WE SAID, THAT YOU MAKE THE MOTION AS RECITED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.
AND THEN IF SOMEONE WANTS TO SECOND IT, THEY CAN DO THAT.
OKAY. I THINK I GOT IT. OKAY. SO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ADOPT AMENDMENT 2025-0001 FOR COASTLINE CHURCH. INCLUDING THE FINDINGS ON PAGE SEVEN.
BASED ON THE PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPROVAL.
CITY ATTORNEY. NOT QUITE. THAT'S OKAY. THIS IS WHAT I THINK YOU CAN DO.
AND AGAIN THEN YOU DON'T HAVE TO ADD TO IT. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS THAT YOU MAKE THE MOTION AS RECITED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. THAT'S ALL YOU WILL HAVE TO SAY. IS THE MOTION AS RECITED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. THE MOTION THAT I RECOMMEND, BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO DO, IS TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION THAT IS IN THE EXHIBIT ONE TO THE STAFF REPORT, INCLUDING SPECIFICALLY INCLUDING THE FINDING ON PAGE SEVEN, FINDING B, WHICH INDICATES THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH SEQUA BASED ON PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
SO NOW WE CAN SAY ADOPT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S. MAKE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S LANGUAGE ON THIS. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS, IS SAY THAT YOU MAKE THE MOTION AS RECITED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.
MAKE A MOTION AS DECIDED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY.
ADEQUATE. THANK YOU. CITY ATTORNEY, YOU HAVE A SECOND.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES FOUR-NOTHING. WITH COMMISSIONER STINE, LAFFERTY AND MERZ ABSENT.
I WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. EXCELLENT JOB.
THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE. ALL RIGHT. ARE THERE ANY REPORTS AT ALL BY COMMISSIONERS THIS EVENING?
[COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTARY AND REQUESTS FOR CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS]
COMMISSIONER BURROWS? NO REPORT. BUT AS MENTIONED A LITTLE BIT EARLIER, AND I'M SURE MR. LARDY WAS GOING TO GIVE US AN UPDATE IN ONE OF OUR FUTURE MEETINGS.COMMISSIONER FOSTER. NOTHING. REPORT, COMMISSIONER HUBINGER.
NOTHING. MR. LARDY, HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO
[STAFF COMMENTS]
[00:25:08]
MAKE A REPORT? AND ALSO, WOULD YOU ALSO, AS A PART OF YOUR REPORT ALSO INDICATE WHAT THE POSSIBLE TRAINING POSSIBLY MIGHT BE OR PUBLIC WORKSHOPS OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE THAT WE MIGHT HAVE IN THE NEAR FUTURE.SURE. SO THANK YOU FOR THAT. A COUPLE OF THINGS.
FIRST IS WE CURRENTLY DO NOT HAVE ANY AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING.
SO WE ARE LOOKING AT POTENTIALLY CANCELING THAT ITEM, THAT MEETING.
WE DO HAVE AGENDA ITEMS FOR BOTH OF THE AUGUST MEETINGS AT THIS POINT.
WE WILL LET EVERYONE KNOW IF ANYTHING CHANGES.
THAT IS A PROJECT THAT THE COMMISSION HEARD WITHIN THE LAST APRIL 2ND.
ON APRIL 2ND AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. LARGER AND RELATED TO THE TRAINING IS CEQA IS EVER CHANGING.
THEY ALSO ADD SOME NEW PROCESSES RELATED TO TRIBAL CONSULTATION AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS.
WE WERE ALREADY CONCEPTUALLY WANTING TO HAVE A PRESENTATION ABOUT CEQA AND SPECIFICALLY THE EXEMPTIONS THAT YOU WOULD START TO SEE, AND WE'RE LOOKING AT ONE OF THE AUGUST DATES FOR THAT BECAUSE AT THIS POINT WE WOULD HAVE A FULL COMMISSION FOR THOSE AUGUST DATES AND WOULD WANT TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THAT TRAINING AS WELL AS AN UPDATE ON THE NEW LAWS AND LEGISLATION.
THAT'S BEEN IMPACTING SOME PROJECTS IN PROCESS AS WELL.
WE ALSO COULD DISCUSS HAVING KIND OF A MORE FOCUSED OFFSITE WORKSHOP.
I PROBABLY WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE AGENDIZE SOMETHING AND WE CAN WORK WITH THE CHAIR TO AGENDIZE SOMETHING FOR THOSE AUGUST MEETINGS, BECAUSE THOSE BILLS ARE EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.
AND SO WE ARE EVALUATING THEM IMMEDIATELY. AND WE COULD START GETTING PROJECTS THAT START TO UTILIZE THOSE NOT LIKELY IN AUGUST, BUT IN THE NEAR TERM THIS YEAR. MOST BILLS THAT AFFECT CEQA OR LAND USE REGULATIONS ARE EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 1ST.
SO THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT PROCESS THAN WE'VE ANTICIPATED RECENTLY.
THANK YOU. MR LARDY. CITY ATTORNEY. NOTHING FOR ME.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND ADJOURN THE MEETING.
THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.