[00:00:04]
GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO THE NOVEMBER 20TH, 2024 MEETING OF THE CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION.
[CALL TO ORDER]
WOULD THE CLERK PLEASE TAKE THE ROLL? ALL COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENT WITH THE EXCEPTION OF COMMISSIONER STINE, WHO IS ABSENT.PLEASE STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED THIS EVENING BY COMMISSIONER DANNA.
WE WILL REQUIRE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM FOR ALL ITEMS ON THE AGENDA, INCLUDING PUBLIC HEARINGS.
REQUEST TO SPEAK FORMS MUST BE TURNED INTO THE MINUTES CLERK PRIOR TO THE ITEM BEING CALLED.
THIS WILL ALLOW SPEAKER TIME TO BE MANAGED IN A MORE EFFICIENT MANNER.
ALL SPEAKERS WILL BE GIVEN THREE MINUTES UNLESS THAT TIME IS REDUCED BY THE CHAIRPERSON.
SPEAKERS MAY NOT GIVE THEIR TIME TO ANOTHER SPEAKER.
EXCUSE ME. GROUP TIME WILL BE PERMITTED FOR ITEMS LISTED ON THE AGENDA.
THOSE SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF A GROUP HAVE TEN MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS CHANGED BY THE CHAIRPERSON.
THE MINUTES CLERK WILL CALL THE NAMES OF THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN THE ORDER.
THE REQUESTS TO SPEAK ARE MADE.
THE BROWN ACT ALLOWS ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC TO COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA.
PLEASE TREAT OTHERS WITH COURTESY, CIVILITY AND RESPECT.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE COMMENTS AS REQUESTED, UP TO A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES.
IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE BROWN ACT, NO ACTION CAN OCCUR ON THESE ITEMS A MINUTES.
CLERK DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER SLIPS FOR TONIGHT? NO, CHAIR WE DO NOT.
SEEING NONE, WE WILL BEGIN TONIGHT'S HEARING.
IF EVERYONE WILL DIRECT THEIR ATTENTION TO THE SCREEN.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE OPENED.
STAFF WILL MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY ASK CLARIFYING QUESTIONS ON THE STAFF PRESENTATION.
THE APPLICANTS WILL MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION AND RESPOND TO CLARIFYING QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS.
THEY WILL HAVE TEN MINUTES FOR THEIR PRESENTATION.
THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY PERIOD WILL THEN BE OPENED.
A TIME LIMIT OF THREE MINUTES IS ALLOTTED TO EACH SPEAKER.
AFTER ALL, THOSE WANTING TO SPEAK HAVE DONE SO, THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY PERIOD WILL BE CLOSED.
THE APPLICANT AND STAFF WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO ISSUES OR QUESTIONS RAISED.
THE COMMISSIONERS WILL THEN DISCUSS THE ITEM AND THEN VOTE ON IT.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CLOSED.
CERTAIN PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS ARE FINAL BUT MAY BE APPEALED TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES.
ON THE BACK OF TONIGHT'S AGENDA, I'LL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE FIRST.
[1. AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON MAINTENANCE DREDGING SUP 2024-006 (DEV06068)]
IF ANY COMMISSIONERS HAD ANY EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING THIS ITEM.I WALKED BY THE SITE THIS WEEKEND.
I'VE BEEN A FAN OF DREDGING FOR YEARS, AND I'VE SEEN THE DREDGING OPERATION FOR DECADES.
NO OTHER EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS.
I DRIVE BY THE SITE TWICE A WEEK.
OKAY. COMMISSIONER MERZ, HOW ABOUT YOURSELF? NO, I DON'T.
ALL RIGHT. MR. STRONG, WOULD YOU PLEASE INTRODUCE THE ITEM? YES. THANK YOU. AND GOOD EVENING.
WE HAVE ONE AGENDA ITEM FOR THIS EVENING AND TO PRESENT IS ASSISTANT PLANNER NICOLE MOREAU.
GOOD EVENING, CHAIR KIM KAMENJARIN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
[00:05:06]
IN ATTENDANCE, WE ALSO HAVE ADAM GALE ON BEHALF OF ANCHOR QEA, THE CONSULTING FIRM RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING THE APPLICATION.DURING TONIGHT'S PRESENTATION, I WILL PRESENT BACKGROUND ON THE PROJECT'S HISTORY AND LOCATION REVIEW THE PROPOSED PROJECT EXPLAIN HOW THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S VARIOUS POLICIES.
LAND USE PLANS, AND PERMIT FINDINGS.
THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE CLAUDE BUD LEWIS DESALINIZATION PLANT HAS FURTHER NECESSITATED THE ROUTINE DREDGE CYCLES, AS THE PLANT'S OPERATIONS ARE DEPENDENT ON A CONSISTENT INTAKE OF SEAWATER.
THE CITY HAS PROCESSED ROUTINE APPLICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT.
THE MOST RECENT APPLICATION FOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN 2017, WHICH RESULTED IN THE ISSUANCE OF A FIVE YEAR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WHICH PERMITTED TWO DREDGE CYCLES, INCLUDING THE LAST DREDGE IN 2021.
SURVEYS OF THE LAGOON SHOWED THAT THE FOLLOWING.
THE PROJECT, CONSISTENT WITH THE RECOMMENDED VOLUMES AND PROCEDURES OF A REGULAR MAINTENANCE DREDGE CYCLE, WILL REMOVE 392,400YD³ OF SAND AND DREDGED MATERIAL WITH UP TO 59,000YD³ OF ADDITIONAL OVER DREDGE.
THE EXPECTED VOLUME OF THE MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED AMOUNTS TO A MAXIMUM OF APPROXIMATELY 451,000YD³.
AFTER THE DREDGE MATERIAL IS REMOVED FROM THE LAGOON THE SAND WILL BE TESTED FOR CONTAMINANTS AND FOR ITS COMPATIBILITY WITH THE SAND AT THE DESIGNATED NORTH, MIDDLE AND SOUTH BEACH DEPOSITION SITES ALONG CARLSBAD STATE BEACH.
THE BEACHES, WHICH HAVE BEEN SUBJECT TO INCREASED EROSION IN RECENT YEARS, HAVE BEEN STUDIED TO DETERMINE THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF EACH SITE, AND ARE EXPECTED TO BENEFIT FROM THE PLACEMENT OF ADDITIONAL SAND.
MOBILIZATION, MIDDLE, SOUTH, AND NORTH BEACH REPLENISHMENT, AND DEMOBILIZATION.
NO BEACH CLOSURES ARE EXPECTED BECAUSE THE APPLICANT WILL HAVE ADEQUATE SIGNAGE AND STAFF ON SITE TO REDIRECT PEDESTRIANS AND SURFERS AWAY FROM ACTIVE WORK AREAS.
THE PROJECTED TIMELINE ANTICIPATES THAT WORK COULD BEGIN AS EARLY AS JANUARY 2025, CONTINGENT ON THE APPLICANT'S ABILITY TO SECURE THE REQUIRED PERMITS FROM OTHER AGENCIES AS PER STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
THE PROJECT MUST BE COMPLETED BY APRIL 15TH, 2025, IN ORDER TO OBSERVE THE NESTING AND SPAWNING SEASONS OF PROTECTED SPECIES AND THE PEAK SUMMER SEASON FOR BEACH GOERS. THE IMAGE ON THE SCREEN SHOWS A PICTURE TAKEN DURING THE PREVIOUS DREDGE CYCLE IN 2021.
THE WORK DONE WITHIN THE LAGOON WILL OPERATE EQUIPMENT OFF OF A BARGE.
THE DREDGE MATERIAL HAS BEEN TESTED TO DETERMINE IF IT IS SUITABLE FOR DEPOSITION.
THOROUGH ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT INDICATES THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH ALL CITY POLICIES AND LAND USE PLANS, INCLUDING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN, MUNICIPAL CODE, LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, AND HABITAT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
IN ORDER FOR STAFF TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT, THE PROJECT APPLICATION WAS ALSO REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE ITS ABILITY TO ADHERE TO THE FINDINGS REQUIRED OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR PROJECTS LOCATED IN A FLOODPLAIN.
[00:10:05]
ADDITIONAL HARM OR HAZARDS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, AND DEMONSTRATE AN OVERALL ADHERENCE TO FLOOD MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.THE PUBLIC WAS MADE AWARE OF THE PROJECT APPLICATION WHEN OVER 600 EARLY PUBLIC NOTICES WERE MAILED TO OCCUPANTS AND RESIDENTS, WITHIN PROXIMITY TO THE PROPOSED DREDGE AND SAND DEPOSITION SITES ON SEPTEMBER 6TH, 2020 FOR THE POSTING OF THE CEQA EXEMPTION ON OCTOBER 7TH, 2024, GAVE THE PUBLIC ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON THE PROJECT.
THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES, INCLUDING THE MAILED NOTICES TO RESIDENTS AND OCCUPANTS, AS WELL AS NEWSPAPER ADS PUBLISHED ON NOVEMBER 8TH, GAVE THE PUBLIC AN ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON THE PROJECT PRIOR TO TONIGHT'S HEARING.
TO DATE, STAFF HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY CORRESPONDENCE FOR THIS PROJECT.
THE PROJECT WAS ALSO PRESENTED BY THE CITY'S PARK PLANNING MANAGER, NICK STUPIN, TO THE BEACH PRESERVATION COMMISSION AT TWO HEARINGS HELD ON JUNE 4TH AND OCTOBER 20TH. OCTOBER 1ST, 2024.
THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND OVERSIGHT OF MULTIPLE STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES.
WHILE THE CITY HAS REVIEWED THE PROJECT APPLICATION AS A WHOLE, OTHER AGENCIES SUCH AS THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MAINTAIN THE JURISDICTION TO EVALUATE THE PROJECT FOR TECHNICAL CRITERIA AND ADHERENCE WITH STANDARDS BEYOND WHAT IS ENFORCEABLE OR REQUIRED BY CITY POLICIES.
CITY STAFF HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE STANDARDS AND FINDINGS REQUIRED BY THE CITY TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH CITY POLICIES AND LAND USE PLANS, SHOULD ANOTHER AGENCY DENY THE PROJECT OR REQUIRE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, THE ISSUANCE OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT WILL NOT SUPERSEDE THE CONDITIONS OR RULING OF ANY OTHER STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCY.
THE CITY PLANNER DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION WAS POSTED ON OCTOBER 7TH, 2024.
NO APPEALS TO THIS DETERMINATION WERE FILED AND THE DETERMINATION IS NOW FINAL.
STATE LAW EXEMPTS DREDGING PROJECTS FROM ADDITIONAL CEQA ANALYSIS IN CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES AUTHORIZE THE SPOIL DEPOSITION. BASED ON THE PRESENTATION THAT YOU HAVE HEARD TONIGHT.
THAT CONCLUDES THE PRESENTATION.
STAFF ARE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS.
COMMISSIONERS, ARE THERE ANY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS OF STAFF? NONE. WONDERFUL.
WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION? GREAT. WE'LL NOW OPEN PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
MINUTES. CLERK, WOULD YOU PLEASE.
DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS FOR TONIGHT? NO, CHAIR. WE DO NOT.
DO I? IF THERE ARE NO SPEAKERS, WE'LL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT OR STAFF? THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER MURPHY.
IT'S KIND OF FUN TO LOOK SOMETHING DIFFERENT FOR A CHANGE.
SO HOW IS IT EVERY 2 OR 3 YEARS, THE SAND ACCUMULATES? IT'S ABOUT. IT'S ABOUT EVERY 2 OR 3 YEARS.
THIS WILL HAVE TO BE DONE RIGHT.
AND THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE PAST, COMMISSIONER.
IT SOUNDED LIKE FROM YOUR PRESENTATION OR I CANNOT MAKE ANY DIRECT ATTRIBUTIONS.
[00:15:07]
THE CURRENT EVALUATION AS COMPARED TO PREVIOUS DREDGE CYCLES.WHAT AND WHAT DID THEY TEST FOR LIKE SAY, CONTAMINANTS? I MEAN, WHAT DID THEY TEST FOR? I MEAN, THAT'S KIND OF I'M JUST CURIOUS.
ADAM, ARE YOU WILLING TO SPEAK TO THE TESTING? I'M CURIOUS, YOU KNOW. YEAH, YEAH.
EXCUSE ME. SIR? PLEASE, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
YEAH. IT'S ON. IT IS WITH [INAUDIBLE] SO EARLIER ON IN THE PRESENTATION, IT MENTIONED THAT THE MATERIAL WOULD BE DREDGED AND THEN TESTED, AND THEN LATER ON IT SAID THAT ALL THE MATERIAL HAS BEEN TESTED, ALL OF THE MATERIAL HAS BEEN TESTED.
THERE'S AN ORGANIZATION OR A COMMITTEE CALLED THE DREDGE MATERIAL MANAGEMENT TEAM.
IT'S ORGANIZED BY THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
IT INCLUDES REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, AND THE EPA.
IT SHOWS THE PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDES A CROSS SECTION OF THE DREDGE CUT, THE ANTICIPATED VOLUME, AND IT SHOWS THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF EACH INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE POINTS THAT I'LL TALK ABOUT IN A SEC.
YOU GET AN APPROVED SAP SAMPLING ANALYSIS PLAN.
AND THE VIBRA CORE IS LIKE IT'S A BATTERY WEIGHTED.
SO YOU HAVE ALL OF THE CONSTITUENTS THAT YOU CAN IMAGINE.
THE PRIMARY CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN FOR DREDGED MATERIAL MATERIALS PCBS, DDT AND MERCURY PRIMARILY.
YOU WRITE WHAT'S CALLED A SAMPLING ANALYSIS REPORT.
YOU PRESENT IT BACK TO THE DMT, AND THEY ISSUE WHAT'S CALLED A SEDIMENT SUITABILITY.
ONCE YOU HAVE THAT SEDIMENT SUITABILITY, IT MEANS THAT ALL OF THE MATERIAL, ALL 450,000YD³ THAT'S PROPOSED HAS BEEN SUFFICIENTLY CHARACTERIZED AND SUITABLE TO BE PLACED ON THE BEACHES THAT ARE PROPOSED.
HOW DO YOU DECIDE HOW MUCH MATERIAL TO DREDGE AT EACH DREDGING SESSION? A LOT OF IT HAS TO DEPEND ON THE DURATION BETWEEN DREDGING.
WHAT HAS BEEN ESTIMATED IS ABOUT 50,000YD³ A YEAR.
THERE'S NOTHING PROHIBITING, NOTHING STOPPING IT AS THE MATERIAL STARTS ACCUMULATING.
IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF FRICTION, RIGHT? SO IT DOESN'T ENTER THE LAGOON AS QUICKLY AS IT DOES THE VOLUME.
I THINK THAT WAS LIKE YOUR INITIAL QUESTION.
THE DREDGE FOOTPRINT REMAINS UNCHANGED.
I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG AGO, BUT FOR THE PAST CYCLES, THE IMAGE THAT YOU SAW THAT SHOWED THE BEACH DISPOSAL LOCATION THAT REMAINS UNCHANGED, THE DEPTHS, THE PROPOSED DEPTHS PLUS AND OVER DREDGE, WHICH IS A TOLERANCE OF THE IMPRECISENESS OF THE DREDGING.
IF YOU THINK ABOUT A BIG HOSE DOWN THERE, STOPPING EXACTLY AT THE DESIRED DEPTH IS IMPOSSIBLE, RIGHT? SO IT ALLOWS A TWO FOOT OF CUSHION.
THE VOLUME IS BASED ON BATHYMETRIC SURVEY.
YOU TAKE THE EXISTING BATHYMETRY AND YOU BASICALLY USE AN AUTOCAD DESIGN.
IT'S AN ENGINEERING. IT'S GOING TO BE AN ENGINEERING STAMP DESIGN THAT DEMONSTRATES IT'S A 3D SOFTWARE PROGRAM THAT YOU'RE ABLE TO REPLICATE WHAT A DREDGE CUT LOOKS LIKE. MULTIPLY THAT TIMES YOUR AREA.
AND THAT'S WHERE YOU GET YOUR ESTIMATED VOLUME.
IT IS VERY, VERY MUCH ESTIMATED THE VOLUME THAT YOU HAD ON THE SCREEN 450,000YD³.
IT DOES INCLUDE A CONTINGENCY, A 20% CONTINGENCY, PARTIALLY BECAUSE AS SOON AS YOU TAKE THE SURVEY, IT'S OBSOLETE, RIGHT? YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A CONTINUED ACCUMULATION AFTER THAT POINT LEADING TO TODAY.
SO YOU ACTUALLY HAVE A SURVEY CONDUCTED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ACTUAL DREDGING.
[00:20:01]
SO YOU'RE ABLE TO DEMONSTRATE TO THE CITY, TO THE AGENCIES THAT YOU DID THAT THE CONTRACTOR DID WHAT WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE PERMIT.YEAH. QUICK QUESTION IN REGARD TO THE OYSTER FARM.
IS THAT TRUE? AND IF IT IS, HOW DOES THE DREDGING DOES IT HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE OYSTER FARM OR HAD IT IN THE PAST WHEN YOU DREDGED LAST TIME? YEAH. YOU KNOW THE ANSWER TO THIS ONE, PAUL.
SO THE OYSTER FARM HAS WRAPPED UP OPERATION AND THERE IS NO IMPACT TO THEM NOW IN THE IN YEARS PAST, WHEN YOU DREDGED BEFORE AND THE OYSTER FARM WAS THERE, SO IS THERE SOME TYPE OF MITIGATION OR SOMETHING THAT YOU DO IN RELATION TO HAVING THE FARM THERE VERSUS NOT? NO WE DIDN'T.
THANK YOU. HOW DO IF IT'S POSSIBLE, HOW DO WE GUARANTEE THAT THE DREDGING OPERATION MEETS THESE DEADLINES. DO YOU MEAN THAT IT'S COMPLETED BY THE APRIL 15TH? RIGHT. IF YOU CAN.
HAS A CONTRACT WITH A CONTRACTOR THAT DOES DREDGING ALL OVER THE STATE.
WE'VE WORKED WITH THEM UP AND DOWN.
THEY'RE KNOWLEDGEABLE, CAPABLE.
THEY PERFORM THE WORK IN 2021.
THEY KNOW HOW MUCH MATERIAL THEY CAN DREDGE IN A PARTICULAR DAY.
WE NEED THE PERMITS. I MEAN, IT'S WE'VE SECURED THE REGIONAL BOARD PERMIT.
WE HAVE THE STATE PARKS RIGHT OF ENTRY.
THE COASTAL COMMISSION IS GOING IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSIONERS FOR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL ON DECEMBER 10TH OR 11TH. I MEET WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROJECT MANAGER EVERY TWO WEEKS FOR OTHER PROJECTS TOO.
HE'S AWARE OF THE TIMELINE TO HAVE THE PROJECT REALLY BE PERMITTED TO ALLOW REMAINING PLANNING AND MOBILIZATION TO ALLOW FOR AN EARLY JANUARY 2025 START DATE.
WE'RE VERY CLOSE. BUT AGAIN, WE'VE BACKED ALL THIS UP.
AND THE REST IS, YOU KNOW, CALCULATED PRODUCTION.
WEATHER CAN CERTAINLY INFLUENCE THAT SAFETY.
AND, YOU KNOW, MOST OF THE DREDGING IS NOT DONE, BUT THERE'S SOME REMAINING, THEN, YOU KNOW, THEY'LL CERTAINLY COMPLY WITH ALL THE REGULATIONS AND RULES, BUT ALL THE EXPECTATIONS BE THAT THEY'RE DONE BY APRIL 15TH.
SO IDEALLY IT'S THIS TIME OF YEAR THAT YOU WANT TO DO THIS, THIS WORK THE WINTER.
WELL, IT'S I MEAN, IT'S A NARROW WINDOW, RIGHT? IT'S SEPTEMBER THROUGH APRIL, SO IT DOESN'T LEAVE A WHOLE LOT OF FLEXIBILITY BETWEEN THEN AND THEN.
SO IT'S, YOU KNOW, PROBABLY A PREFERRED TIMELINE EARLY SPRING TO GET THE WORK LATE LATE WINTER.
THANK YOU. ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER LAFFERTY? YES. THANK YOU.
THE INTAKE FOR THE DESAL PLANT PROJECT.
HOW IS THAT COMPLETE NOW? NO COMMISSIONER.
THE PROJECT WAS APPROVED IN OCTOBER OF 2022 AND IT STILL REMAINS ACTIVE TODAY.
THEN HOW WILL THE DREDGING AFFECT THAT? THERE WILL BE NO IMPACT ON THE INTAKE PROJECT.
THE INTAKE PROJECT IS ABOUT CALL IT 95% COMPLETE.
IT WAS BROUGHT ABOUT. IF EVERYONE DOESN'T KNOW BY THE OCEAN PLAN, THE CALIFORNIA OCEAN PLAN, WHICH REQUIRED A SMALLER SCREENS AND A FLOW RATE OF A HALF A FOOT PER SECOND.
THOSE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOW MET.
SO AS FAR AS THE INTAKE PROJECT, THERE IS SOME CIVIL WORKS AND SOME MINOR THINGS TO WRAP UP, BUT THE INTENT OF THE PROJECT AND THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS THAT IT WAS INTENDED TO ADHERE TO ARE NOW SATISFIED.
[00:25:04]
THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT OR STAFF? SEEING NONE. LET'S OPEN UP COMMISSION DISCUSSION.WOULD ANY COMMISSIONERS LIKE TO DISCUSS THIS ITEM FURTHER? COMMISSIONER MERZ, THANK YOU SIR.
IT'S INTERESTING TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT HERE IN PLANNING COMMISSION.
I THINK REALLY APPRECIATE THE DETAILED ANSWERS TO OUR QUESTIONS.
I HAVE TO SAY, THE LAND LEASE TO.
IT'S A STRANGE INSTRUMENT THAT YOU SIGNED A TEN YEAR LEASE TO, YOU KNOW, AS A CONTRACTOR.
THAT JUST SEEMS LIKE A STRANGE $167 A YEAR ON A TEN YEAR LEASE.
IT JUST IT JUST SEEMED LIKE THE STRANGEST INSTRUMENT I'VE SEEN IN DEALING WITH LEASE DOCUMENTS.
BUT, YOU KNOW, I VERY MUCH SUPPORT THE PROJECT, AND I APPRECIATE THE PRESENTATION.
I'M SORRY, COMMISSIONER MEENES.
YES. FIRST OF ALL, ONE FOR THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT.
I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT IT'S A FIVE YEAR PERMIT IN THAT THEY DON'T HAVE TO KEEP COMING BACK, YOU KNOW, EVERY OTHER YEAR TO, TO GET APPROVAL FROM, FROM THE CITY IN THAT REGARD. SO I DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE ELSE READY TO MAKE A MOTION IF ANYONE ELSE HAS ANY COMMENTS IN THAT REGARD, THAT'S FINE.
MAY I HAVE A MOTION ON THIS ITEM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MERZ.
THE MOTION PASSES SIX ZERO WITH COMMISSIONER STINE, ABSENT.
LET'S NOW CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND THANK STAFF AND THE APPLICANT FOR ATTENDING.
THAT CONCLUDES THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF TONIGHT'S MEETING.
IS THERE A REPORT FROM ANY COMMISSIONER?
[PLANNING COMMISSIONER REPORT]
NO. OKAY.IS THERE A REPORT FROM THE CITY PLANNER?
[CITY PLANNER REPORT]
YES. THANK YOU. CHAIR.JUST TO REPORT OUT THAT ON DECEMBER 4TH, WE WILL HAVE A BUSY AGENDA ITEM.
OKAY. ANY REPORT FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY?
[CITY ATTORNEY REPORT]
NOTHING FROM ME. THANK YOU.WELL, SEEING NOTHING FURTHER WISH YOU ALL A HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO YOU AND YOUR FAMILIES.
AND THE MEETING STANDS ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.